SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Oooh! How Fun!!
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1657512430

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/22 at 21:07:10

Title: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/22 at 21:07:10

Ooohhh, Please be real!!

4Chan reportedly cracked Hunter Biden's phone. Everything is being released.
EuroWeekly News: Shock as 4chan apparently cracks Hunter Biden’s phone password and leaks everything.

RUMOURS circulating on social media on Sunday, July 10 suggest that 4chan, an anonymous English-language imageboard website, has apparently cracked Hunter Biden’s iPhone backup password and has begun leaking everything on the site.

Senior Editor of Human Events, Jack Posobiec – who recently paid tribute to Dr Zelenko following his death – revealed that “4chan has already created torrents for the Hunter Biden iPhone and iCloud backups and are now seeding them.”

He continued: “That means even if 4chan gets shut down the copies will still be out there.”
[.]
One person on Twitter wrote that there is “over 450Gb of data from the 4chan hack of Hunter Biden’s iCloud account INCLUDING President Joe Biden’s private phone numbers!”

A report from dailyveracity.com has suggested that the person responsible for the leak has been threatened by the Biden administration.

“I was told Hunter had sexual relationships with a lot of people in the so-called “elite” and families are ashamed,’ the anonymous person told the website.

Unverified videos and photos have already started making the rounds on Twitter.

Hit the Euro Weekly link. Hit the Twitter links in the story. Even if 4Chan went dark in the next ten minutes, ALL of this is being Archived.

Posted by Drake's Place at 10:59 AM
Labels: 4chan, biden, cover up, crooked dems, drugs, Fair Use 107, hunter biden, liberals are liars, news, pedos, pervy joe, venomous liberals

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/10/22 at 21:33:17

This is like the 9th time in the past 4 months I've seen this claim. Don't hold your breath.

4chan also claimed Hunter was dead.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/22 at 21:58:40

First time I've heard4chan in a long time.

This just popped up on a different site

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10846603/Hunter-Bidens-search-history-reveals-obsession-porn.html

Hownaheck can I verify any of that?

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/10/22 at 22:05:19

We can't verify it since it just came out.

It won't matter though because if it comes out as false it will just be "Deep State" interference or some other excuse to claim something is factual without evidence.

On the flip side if it is real, people will just say it is all fake.

The value in this is the creation and exposure of the material. Not the accuracy.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/22 at 22:29:40

Can you explain what you mean? The Value is? To whom? The laptop seems to be real. But it's not getting coverage.

I remember the people who lied about that laptop. Russia Russia Russia was a fabrication.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/22 at 22:47:09

Not a great look..

http://https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/06/01/14/58187589-10846603-Hunter_Biden_s_abandoned_laptop_has_laid_bare_his_secret_porn_ad-a-1_1654089423251.jpg

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/11/22 at 00:26:31

Can you explain what you mean? The Value is? To whom?

It could be real for sure.

What I mean is making up false information and putting it online is in itself valuable because some people will believe it anyway.

Look at your George Washington quote. When you wonder why people make up stuff like that:

"Why do people do nuts like that?"

The answer is because it works. You posted the image, acknowledged it was fake, then reposted it here again as factual. That's how well making up sh!t online works.

If a lie is conducive to what someone already believes, it's harder to see it as a lie. So with this laptop stuff, even if portions are proven to be untrue, since people want it to be true, they will ignore that its not.

Just like the Washington quote. Either you changed your mind based off new evidence indicating that the Mt Vernon Preservation has been wrong all along, or is now corrupt and secretly anti-gun and have been preparing for this photoshopped image for over a century, somehow.

Or you simply think it's true again because it sounds like it should be. That's how easy it is. Make up a lie, post it, and watch people believe.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/22 at 01:33:23

If he Didn't say that
He should have
Howzat?

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/11/22 at 03:22:55

"If he Didn't say that
He should have"

He definitely did not say that.

This further proves the point. If it's something you want to be true, you literally forget its a lie. That's how easy it is to manipulate people online.

Just tell them something they want to be true, attach an altered image and watch them go through life spreading lies as fact, being mad about things that Never. Even. Happened.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by pg on 07/11/22 at 03:58:27

5070727A6770150 wrote:

Never. Even. Happened.

How about this?

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj9V-XjCol8[/media]

Best regards,

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/22 at 04:03:17

Why are you worked up about what I choose to believe?
Why don't you spend that effort pointing out how believing in the global warming stuff is ludicrous?

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/22 at 05:55:20

Why are you worked up about what I choose to believe?
Why don't you spend that effort pointing out how believing in the global warming stuff is ludicrous?

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/11/22 at 10:20:11

"Why are you worked up about what I choose to believe?"

I don't care what you believe. I am saying I do not believe it.

If you want to believe George Washington said what is on that image you posted then go ahead. Live life thinking that is real while saying you want "truth". However if you post it a third time claiming it is real, I will still disagree.

My point is that by agreeing that it is fake, then posting it again as being real, it shows just how effective a false image can be. Your actions are answering your own questions regarding why people make up these lies: Because it works.

"Why don't you spend that effort pointing out how believing in the global warming stuff is ludicrous?"

I have said climate change analysis in most cases are inaccurate multiple times.

When members here that believe in Global Warming re-post images as fact, that they already said were lies, then I will disagree with them.

Nobody else is doing that though.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/22 at 11:53:33

Yeah the members of the Climate Cult of DOOM have stopped professing their undying Faith. The ones who believe Kyle murdered the guys who were trying to kill him and should be rotting away in prison don't say it. Not seeing any arguments offered up about how the Constitutional Right for an abortion, which is not mentioned in the Constitution, has been wrongly stripped from the birthing people, while the Constitution clearly says, The Right of the People to Keep and Bear arms shall not be infringed, and that right has been infringed and the lefties would like nothing more than to see it Completely and Totally Infringed.
And what actually happened, relative to abortion is,the decision has been placed where it belonged all along. It's a states rights situation. The federal government has been overreaching all along.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by MnSpring on 07/11/22 at 11:53:50

0A2A28203D2A4F0 wrote:

"... I don't care what you believe. ..."

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Eegore on 07/11/22 at 12:17:10

Does that mean you will stop,
'Schooling'
JOG for posting something
not verified by you.

And start 'Schooling' others,
for saying things not verified by you.

No. I could care less if it is verified by me, it should be verified by the person posting it, especially when they posted it already and acknowledged it was not true.

Someone already messaged me about my interactions with Jog and I provided a breakdown of post averages. At this time, and exclusively at the time of this post, not any other point in time before or after but exactly and only at the time this post is made, JoG had 17 created posts compared to lets say 0 by Serowbot on the current top page.

So by my math, and exclusively my math with the exemption of all other math, my math indicates that on average JoG posts more than lets say Serowbot. So to me, I will most likely communicate with JoG over let's say Serowbot. Also lets say Serowbot is not repeatedly posting the exact same information over and over claiming it is new information. If he did, I would debate that if it is inaccurate one time, it will be inaccurate every single time.

If we take the last 25 posts from Serowbot it took from the time of this post to 07/04/22 at 11:07:52.

If we take the last 25 posts from Jog it took from the time of this post to Yesterday at 21:07:10.

"Or things simply not the truth like
'Kavanaugh testified under oath
that he considered Roe v Wade settled law.
He was only confirmed because of that lie.
Should SCOTUS's lie under oath?'"

No. I have had the same number of comments on this issue with JoG as I have had with lets say Serowbot. None.

Also lets say Serowbot, typically doesn't post claims about topics I have tremendous amounts of information on and decades of working experience with. When let's say Serowbot makes comments about the SCOTUS, I rarely have information to add. That rarity to the specific topic of SCOTUS applies equally to JoG as it is the topic I am commenting on, not the human posting it.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by Serowbot on 07/11/22 at 14:15:34

2D0E331012090E07600 wrote:

[quote author=0A2A28203D2A4F0 link=1657512430/0#12 date=1657560011]"... I don't care what you believe. ..."

Does that mean you will stop,
'Schooling'
JOG for posting something
not verified by you.

And start 'Schooling' others,
for saying things not verified by you.

Or things simply not the truth like
'Kavanaugh testified under oath
that he considered Roe v Wade settled law.
He was only confirmed because of that lie.
Should SCOTUS's lie under oath?'

[/quote]
I did not quote Kavanaugh... I was pointing out the false impression he gave.
This is indisputable.
Collins and Manchin have said so.

Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who voted to confirm Gorsuch in 2017 and Kavanaugh in 2018, expressed alarm at the consequential outcome, saying they felt misled by the two justices.

"This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon," Collins, an abortion-rights supporter, said in a statement.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/22 at 19:59:54

Well, looks like someone figured out that Precedent was actually bad law,and rectified a fifty long years mistake.

Title: Re: Oooh! How Fun!!
Post by MnSpring on 07/12/22 at 07:11:22

4E584F524A5F52493D0 wrote:

" I did not quote Kavanaugh... I was pointing out the false impression he gave. ..."

Are these quotes, 'false impressions',
or just ramblings of a ULTRA, UL DFI FDS ?

"...He left before his soufflé because he decided half the country should risk death if they have an ectopic pregnancy within the wrong state lines..."

“...Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony..."