|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Because there truly is no limit to stupid /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1642984193 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/22 at 16:29:53 |
|
Title: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/22 at 16:29:53 So, it's fine to fire people who don't want the jab. And the Rona is a threat to the nation and everyone needs to do their part. And it's better to have the streets full of angry people burning and looting because silence in the face of racism is worse than spreading the Rona. But illegal aliens? Naah! You don't have to get the jab. And, if you don't have the kind of ID that is required for American citizens, you can use your arrest warrant!!! Because STUPID is without limits. Department of Homeland Security and you’re good to board any US flight! According to the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA), illegal aliens are now allowed to use their arrest and deportation warrants as an “alternative ID” to board commercial flights in the US. TSA: Illegal aliens can use arrest warrants as flight IDs eturbonews.com/3015157/tsa-illegal-aliens-can-use-arrest-warrants-as-flight-ids/ eturbonews.com/3015157/tsa-illegal-aliens-can-use-arrest-warra… Feedback TSA Allows Illegal Immigrants Use Arrest Warrants As … https://policetribune.com/tsa-allows-illegal... 2 days ago · TSA Allows Illegal Immigrants Use Arrest Warrants As ID To Fly. Sandy Malone 5 seconds ago. Washington, DC – The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has confirmed that illegal immigrants are allowed to use their arrest warrants as alternate forms of identification to board flights. “A … TSA confirms it lets illegal immigrants use … https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tsa-confirms... 2 days ago · "For non-citizens and non-U.S. nationals who do not otherwise Let's Go, Brandon!! |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/23/22 at 16:56:28 "The number of illegal border crossings has skyrocketed since the Biden administration rolled back former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies." |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/23/22 at 21:40:52 I am not sure what the logic is other than trying to keep a large number of illegal immigrants collecting and overcrowding one area. One thing is ICE Form I-200 is not an actual warrant as we typically perceive one. It only applies to certain Federal agents and does not indicate a probable cause for a crime, so no immediate arrest is required except by specific individuals. https://casetext.com/regulation/code-of-federal-regulations/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/chapter-i-department-of-homeland-security/subchapter-b-immigration-regulations/part-236-apprehension-and-detention-of-inadmissible-and-deportable-aliens-removal-of-aliens-ordered-removed/subpart-a-detention-of-aliens-prior-to-order-of-removal/section-2361-apprehension-custody-and-detention |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/24/22 at 01:25:10 Good Frikkin GAWD.. Ship them all over America,, Send them home Secure the border It's just So confusing.. For some people |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/24/22 at 08:09:57 Speaking of, STUPID. Just saw the 'Today Show', Referring to a cruse ship being, 'arrested'. Hello !!!!!, their was a order to: 'U.S. judge granted an order to seize the vessel as part of a lawsuit over unpaid fuel' Yet some Ultra Liberal, DFI FDSing, Socialist, not knowing, (or CARING) what really is happening, just made up something, and said, a inanimate object was, 'arrested'. And ONE YEAR and 3/4's later, finally the other three for, 'Floyd's', (a drug addled felon, violently resisting arrest) are put on trial. And the list goes on. Not the 5% nut fringe on both sides. It is the 10 (DFI/FDS) to 1 (Adults), that are 'considered' main stream. (By the DFI/FDS/UL/Socialists) |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/24/22 at 17:56:09 And because they are Soo Smart they gave them a heads up. It's almost as if law enforcement wanted to make it easier for the cruise line to get away with the theft. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/27/22 at 18:00:25 So, ‘mush for brains’ is going to select a person, Because of ONLY, their skin color, and sex. And that is perfectly OK. Not at all, racist. What is, ‘racist’, is, the selection of the best qualified for a Job, REGARDLESS, of their skin color and sex. Got that now ! Mush For Brains has spoken !!!!! (well his socialist handlers have spoken) |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/27/22 at 19:36:09 So, ‘mush for brains’ is going to select a person, Because of ONLY, their skin color, and sex. And that is perfectly OK. Not at all, racist. Correct, that is not racist by definition. Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. I know this discussion has happened plenty of times already but "racist" is not any action of any kind that is decided specifically by race. If I am casting roles for a movie and want a Black male to play Muhammad Ali that is not "racist". If I want a White male actor for George Washington in a play, that is not "racist". "Racist" requires either a perception of superiority or an antagonistic behavior, not just a decision because of someone's race. Biden is making an irresponsible decision, but by definition not a racist one. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/28/22 at 08:19:59 1E3E3C34293E5B0 wrote:
The word, ‘Gay’ (in describing a human) used to mean that person was a happy person all the time. Now it means something else, simply because some people kept using that word for that, ’new’ meaning. Same as ‘Plunger’, ‘Cute, ‘Bully, ‘Matrix’, ’Nice’, ‘Backlog’, ‘Fizzle’, and on and on and on. In some cases a word has changed to the meaning of the direct opposite. Think of words that are now, in the transition. ‘Bad’. Used to mean a ‘thief’, ‘killer’, ‘lier’, no good at something. Today, in many places ‘BAD’ is good. Like (xxx person is) a ‘Bad’ actor. a ‘Bad’ singer, a ‘Bad’ dancer. Where the meaning is, that person is a very good, actor/singer/dancer. So it is with, ‘Racist’. Mush for Brains, is Racist. Just as millions of other people are racist, for hiring the best person for a job. For stating riots/looting/destruction is wrong. For stating Illegals sneaking accost the border is wrong. And for stating a opinion that is different. People are changing the meaning of that word ! (Remember the word; Ain't) Why is it ‘racist’ for a white skin actor to portray a black skin person, and it is NOT racist for a black skin actor to portray a white skin person? Did/does, Aaron Burr, George Washington, Annie, Joy Behar, +, +, +, have black skin ? |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/28/22 at 08:30:00 "Why is it ‘racist’ for a white skin actor to portray a black skin person, and it is NOT racist for a black skin actor to portray a white skin person?" It's not. Racist by definition and racist by personal opinion are two different things. I now proclaim racist means anything yellow. Lemons and bananas are now racist. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/28/22 at 09:04:45 "... Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas admitted on September 21, according to The Hill, that “of the 60,000 Afghans who have entered the U.S., nearly 8,000 are either U.S. citizens or residents, while about 1,800 are SIV holders, having obtained visas after assisting the U.S. military.” That left around 50,200 Afghan refugees for whom we had no certain identification and no assurance whatsoever that they weren’t jihad terrorists. We didn’t know anything about them at all, and still don’t. After admitting something as potentially catastrophic as the fact that it brought evacuees from a jihadi hotspot with no identification whatsoever into the United States ..." A-Yep, no limit to, Mush For Brains, being, STUPID. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/28/22 at 09:11:14 6B4B49415C4B2E0 wrote:
I see. So you believe it IS Racist, for a black skin actor to portray a white skin person. And Not Racist, for a white skin actor to portray a black skin actor. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/28/22 at 09:54:43 "I see. So you believe it IS Racist, for a black skin actor to portray a white skin person. And Not Racist, for a white skin actor to portray a black skin actor. " I do not believe that. If we use my actual words I said it is "not" racist. Not racist and only the word "not" with the exemption of all other known words. "It is not." But if we remove the word "Not" we get: "So you believe it IS Racist" This removal of the word "not" changes my statement, but since there is a direct record here it can be clearly seen that I said "not". I believe it is not racist. Racist by definition and racist by personal opinion are two different things. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Serowbot on 01/28/22 at 11:30:07 When MN says he does not like Biden,.. it means he likes Biden.... Sounds like junior high... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/29/22 at 07:58:26 457770616677605F736079120 wrote:
A-Yep ! |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/29/22 at 08:35:26 7F5F5D55485F3A0 wrote:
Please explain to all of us, how the number one meaning of the word, 'Gay', changed from, being a description of a person who was always a happy go lucky person, to a description of a person who has sex with the same sex person. And, how the words, 'bad' and many many others, changed their meaning. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/29/22 at 10:18:34 "Please explain to all of us, how the number one meaning of the word, 'Gay', changed from, being a description of a person who was always a happy go lucky person, to a description of a person who has sex with the same sex person. And, how the words, 'bad' and many many others, changed their meaning." You are referencing semantic progression but over-simplifying the acceptance of accuracy which is developed over a longer period of time. For instance if people start saying anything yellow is "Racist" that doesn't automatically become true and an accepted use of an English word. "Bad" and "Gay" evolved over decades. Gay evolved from 12 century to the 1960s. Narrowing and Broadening, are mutually exclusive in semantic progression and typically Amelioration and Pejoration are as well however a mix of Narrowing and Amelioration for example can happen. What you describe as "Gay" is a mix of broadening and amelioration that still adhere to the rules of Polysemy. What you describe as "Racist" is more like a debate of personal opinion as there is no widespread polysemous use of the word in the way you are trying to debate. "Racist" by the methods we are using here would not meet a lexicography standard to alter the semantic progression. If enough people over the next few decades agree, and use, the term "racist" as any decision that made by race, and excludes the other defining factors, the word "racist" will then become polysemous and eventually end up defined in the way you propose. But today, not enough evidence by lexicographic standard applies to have "racist" mean what you are interpreting it to mean at this time. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/29/22 at 11:39:54 624240485542270 wrote:
The meaning of the word, 'gay', to be sex, with same sex people, started in the very late 18th century, and was mostly used by/for/in the 'gay' community. and by the 50's+ it had become common place, as a meaning for sex, with same sex people. 'Bad' meaning 'good', is a very recent change, 1 or 2 decades. Explain the change of, 'plunger', and why ! The whole point is, You do not get the point ! |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/29/22 at 11:55:38 1E3E3C34293E5B0 wrote:
I didn't know what, was, "lexicographic standard" so I looked it up . And several web pages said essentially the same thing. "Alphabetical order is a specific kind of lexicographical ordering. The term lexicographical often refers to the mathematical rules or sorting." "The lexicographic or lexicographical order (also known as lexical order, or dictionary order) is a generalization of the alphabetical order." "The term lexicographical often refers to the mathematical rules or sorting." "... shows that conditional probability spaces are equivalent to a subclass of LPS’s called lexicographic conditional probability spaces (LCPS’s) if the state space is finite and it is possible to condition on any nonempty set ..." Can you explain, how the alphabetical order of a word, changes it's meaning ? |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Eegore on 01/29/22 at 13:43:11 "Explain the change of, 'plunger', and why ! The whole point is, You do not get the point !" I get the point, I am saying the English word "racist" and only the word "racist" with the exemption of all other known words has not yet reached a standard where it can be polysemous with the definition you provide. It might be someday, but it has not yet become that. "Can you explain, how the alphabetical order of a word, changes it's meaning ?" Lexicographic standard is a semantic progressive word used to describe the standards both Practical Lexicographers and Theoretical Lexicographers use. But case in point, it is not widely used enough to truly become polysemous with the more widely understood definition of the word lexicographic. |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by Serowbot on 01/29/22 at 14:39:21 Lexicographic is pertaining to words, from the word lexicon. The order and the standard are where you're confused. A standard... would be the generally accepted meaning of a word. Meanings change over time. Words can have more than one definition. Language is not static. We don't say thee and thou much any more. "Gay" does mean happy, in fact usually more than just happy, or perhaps happy to the point of frivolity. It became an insult to insinuate that homosexuals were frivolous and flaunting standard behavior. But, rather than be insulted, gays adopted the label as their own, thereby rendering it harmless. Once a word becomes universally defined as meaning something, it joins the standard lexicography. ...but why are you trying to make this political issue? PS Guess what word has the most different definitions listed in the dictionary? Run You wanna' gripe about the word run? :) |
|
Title: Re: Because there truly is no limit to stupid Post by MnSpring on 01/29/22 at 19:13:10 6771667B63767B60140 wrote:
I'm NOT the one, or in the group, that constantly calls someone, 'RACIST' Just because they disagree with the UL, DFI, FDS, Socialists. OBTW, Ya get rid of that AWFUL (gasp) GUN yet. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |