SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> What If ...
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1638325516

Message started by MnSpring on 11/30/21 at 18:25:16

Title: What If ...
Post by MnSpring on 11/30/21 at 18:25:16

What would happen if students at a school said:

“We don’t want that person at this school because he has Black Skin”

“We don’t want that person at this school because he practices Muslim religion”

“We don’t want that person at this school because he is of Mexican Decent”

Yet it is PERFECTLY OK to say:
“We don’t want that person at this school because he was acquitted of a crime”
According to the UL, DFI, FDS, Socialists !

“Arizona State students demand Kyle Rittenhouse ‘withdraw’, get ‘killer off our campus”
“Arizona State University Students Want Kyle Rittenhouse To Be Banned”
“ members of groups called Students for Socialism ASU, Students for Justice in Palestine, Multicultural Solidarity Coalition, and Mecha de ASU want university officials to “withdraw” the Rittenhouse from class and ban it from campus. “
“Our campus is no longer safe at the moment. We want to mitigate this danger as much as possible,”

And Now !!!!!

"Kyle Rittenhouse is no longer enrolled at Arizona State, school officials say"

Title: Re: What If ...
Post by Eegore on 11/30/21 at 19:40:26

I think a more connected comparison would be if they said "We don't want a Muslim student because he was acquitted of a crime."

In your example you are comparing religion and race directly to a legal outcome and each in exclusivity. As in stating that Religion is a single reason. Race is a single reason. Then saying "Acquittal" is a single reason.

I am not surprised, colleges have never exactly been grounds for fair and equal treatment.

Title: Re: What If ...
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/01/21 at 05:15:45

Is it

We don't want a Muslim student because he was acquitted of a crime."

Or is it

We don't want a Muslim student even though he was acquitted of a crime."

Reports of Kyle shooting black people didn't help. That those reports or claims, were obviously false,, doesn't seem to matter.
Kyle is a white supremacist.
Even IF the people he shot Were black, self defense is self defense.

There is another group meeting today pushing to keep Kyle in ASU

Title: Re: What If ...
Post by MnSpring on 12/02/21 at 16:47:09

0D2D2F273A2D480 wrote:

" ... your example you are comparing religion and race directly to a legal outcome and each in exclusivity. ..."

No.

It is a simple statement,
comparing,
Biased, prejudicial, racist,
Statements !

Which the UL, DFI, FDS, Socialists,
would get their panties in a, BIG, bunch,
if ANYONE would say the first 3 things.

Yet, THEY can be
Biased, prejudicial, racist,
AS MUCH AS THEY WANT !!!!!

Title: Re: What If ...
Post by Eegore on 12/02/21 at 18:07:33

"It is a simple statement,
comparing,
Biased, prejudicial, racist,
Statements !"

Yes the first three being racial/religious and the last statement not mentioning any of that at all.

If they are being "racist" wouldn't they say a "White guy" acquitted of a crime and not just mention the crime in exclusivity?