SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> That Lasted !
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1604797270

Message started by MnSpring on 11/07/20 at 17:01:10

Title: That Lasted !
Post by MnSpring on 11/07/20 at 17:01:10

Bot LETS his pets call members here,
'Morons', and 'Communist Gay Socialists',
after he made such a show of Authority.

Get used to it, UL DFI, FDS, Socialists,
Can now do and say, Anything they want.
(Just as long as they agree with Bot)
And call ANY,  Member, or politician, anything they want.

But a Conservative can NOT, call a UL, DFI, FDS, Socialist, or any politician,
(especially AOC), anything bad.


2B363A32372D313C31382E32590 wrote:
...In the words of Trump loving morons the last four years...  



392B3F3C2B2D2F4A0 wrote:
... join your gullible buddies on ‘Gay Communists for Socialism’ ...



Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/07/20 at 17:16:02

"trump loving morons" is fine as it's not directed personally at anyone here, similar to the way you lot refer to 'libtards' and so forth.

And my post was pointing to a sham facebook account and Communist Gay Socialists was the name of the group, so that also is not personally abusing anyone here. I can call them 'your buddies' which is also not personal abuse.

I see though that you don't object to philthy mikes invective filled personal post. And instead like Trump just try and take anything you want out of context to make a completely fictitious point.

then because it's not personal abuse, so it doesn't go into the perp thread, so then you whinge just like the way trump is whinging about all his made up bullshit.

Title: Re: That Lasted !gh
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/07/20 at 18:15:14

Biden supporters suck d ick.
That's not personal.

Title: Re: That Lasted !gh
Post by Rockn on 11/07/20 at 18:24:12


746B6D6A7770417141796B672C1E0 wrote:
Biden supporters suck sick.
That's not personal.



Yes. All 4,000,000 more Biden voters.
Forum autocorrect owned you there. SAD!


Hey Mn, sorry if you relate or identify with trump loving morons.

You're willfully obtuse about forum censorship. Your initial comment about AOC was disgusting and unprovoked. It's censored because it reflects poorly on you and the forum the same way allowing disgusting discourse about pedophilia does. So whine, cry, get your feelings hurt, but get over the act that Serow or anyone else here is out to get you. It's hard enough to understand your word vomit acronym filled posts as is.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Serowbot on 11/08/20 at 06:31:36


7754694A4853545D3A0 wrote:
Bot LETS his pets call members here,
'Morons', and 'Communist Gay Socialists',
after he made such a show of Authority.

Get used to it, UL DFI, FDS, Socialists,
Can now do and say, Anything they want.
(Just as long as they agree with Bot)
And call ANY,  Member, or politician, anything they want.

But a Conservative can NOT, call a UL, DFI, FDS, Socialist, or any politician,
(especially AOC), anything bad.

[quote author=2B363A32372D313C31382E32590 link=1604781321/0#2 date=1604781995]...In the words of Trump loving morons the last four years...  



392B3F3C2B2D2F4A0 wrote:
... join your gullible buddies on ‘Gay Communists for Socialism’ ...


[/quote]
MN,... you don't have a post without  "UL DFI, FDS, Socialists,"
... and we don't agree.
You can thank me later.

Serow

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 06:35:51


"You're willfully obtuse about forum censorship. Your initial comment about AOC was disgusting and unprovoked. It's censored because it reflects poorly on you and the forum the same way allowing disgusting discourse about pedophilia does."


 I agree.

 This is obviously very selective complaints, and anyone else would just accept the facts of the environment they choose to engage in.  Any adult should understand that the forum moderators are not willing to let insults towards women be posted consistently.  

 Why is it so important to call AOC, or anyone else names on this forum?  Why is this an issue at all?  Is it really worth the repeatedly crying, is name calling that important to your capacity to communicate?

 If you do not like the way the forum is moderated don't use it.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Serowbot on 11/08/20 at 07:07:59

Just to drive Mn a little nutz...
;D
http://https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/71f/d0b/71299b5da9a440843212419f128e549e50-24-aoc.rsquare.w330.jpg

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by MnSpring on 11/08/20 at 08:48:52


0E2E2C24392E4B0 wrote:
. . .  Any adult should understand that the forum moderators are not willing to let insults towards women be posted consistently.  ...

So you are saying, the T.D.S. affected people,
that CONSTANTLY,
Posted numerous and frequently very despairing things about the P.O.T.U.S.
are perfectly OK,
in saying the disturbing things they have said.

OK, got-it !

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 13:35:20


"So you are saying, the T.D.S. affected people,
that CONSTANTLY,
Posted numerous and frequently very despairing things about the P.O.T.U.S.
are perfectly OK,
in saying the disturbing things they have said.
"


 Yes.  This is how privately owned forums work.

 How many times will you say you "got it" then complain?  You don't get it or you would stop bringing it up.

 Yes we, on this forum, can talk trash about Trump in ways we can not about women.  We can talk trash about Trump using words, phrases, statements, innuendo and all other forms of communication that we can not about women.

 Why is it so important for you to call AOC names on this forum?

 If you do not like the rules, nobody is making you log in.

 

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/08/20 at 13:46:06

Trump and his supporters look to be fair game.
She's not a member
Can't be butthurt by being called names.

To Hell with the commie B itch

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/08/20 at 14:14:50

I have to say it is heartening to hear a couple of men here stand up for women. You know the work that I do is primarily directed at restoring women to their rightful place in society because the world is out of balance.

It is the job of the men to protect the women and then the women protect the dharma (look it up). What Clinton did with regards to being President and abusing the power relationship with a naive intern was the very epitome of why the world is so fcuked up.

A word about personal abuse, for me to suggest that someone on this forum even if I name them like for instance JoG, is 'gullible'. Is not abuse. Gullible is a word with a clear meaning and if I want to point out for example that him thinking and posting to the effect that trump won because he believes something that Don Jr or Guiliani might say, or that he thinks the count was fraudulently run, even in States that are controlled by Republicans, then it's not abuse to say that is gullible, in fact it's the very fcuking definition of the word.

Getting back to my post though I was referring to a facebook page called Gay Communists for Socialism

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/nov/06/trump-supporters-gay-communists-for-socialism-facebook-group

The whole point of the owner of the group was to show precisely how easily manipulated and gullible are these types of Trump supporters. Even when the name was changed to Gay Communists for Trump, they believed it was to hide from Facebook moderators.

That is ludicrously gullible. The posts of the Trump supporters here, and you're free to disagree are equally gullible, and I say that because no one offers any actual evidence of the so called fraud they claim, and somehow everyone is against them, including Republican governors, Republican Judges and Republican Supreme Court judges. It's fair to call that gullible, if a single unsupported allegation is believed as absolute fact, or some actual single piece of fraud is then used to extrapolate the entire election.

So I just said, 'join your buddies'. Meaning those other gullible people. There's no abuse there or name calling.

Check out this John Oliver Clip, it starts out with Trump Supporters saying that they don't blame Trump for the virus because "he did the best he could".

But did he, check out the clip and see if you agree he did the best he could. If you believe Trump then you are gullible by definition.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuVo4fnpLC8[/media]

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/08/20 at 14:35:22


3E2127203D3A0B3B0B33212D66540 wrote:
To Hell with the commie B itch


Seriously, is there any reason why this forum needs to exist. There's like less than half a dozen extremely angry and gullible people who delight in denigrating women, and then try to dress it up as something else.

I see the site has hundreds of members none of whom post here. Does anyone think that there's anything to be gained by simply having a platform filled with ugliness. On a motorcycling forum.

I joined the largest Triumph Forum recently because...
http://https://i.postimg.cc/9DXkv7Fg/IMG-0777.jpg (https://postimg.cc/9DXkv7Fg)

And there was a bit of a kerfuffle when I arrived, a rather long thread of people bitchin' about snowflakes and such because basically the political forum was removed, and a bunch of d!ckheads were not happy about it, and they went off to do their own thing on some offsite reddit group or whatever.

Please someone explain to me the fcuking purpose of this part of the site. I for one am pretty well done with it. I cannot believe that I ever took any of the people here like JoG, Mn, or WM as anything other than what they are, people who have no interest whatsoever other than denying facts and dragging anyone who engages with them into a cesspool of bad faith sh!t. It is just a platform to air ugliness.

There's plenty of place to do that, why fcuk up this very special site to the much loved S40. Are the numbers of members going to suddenly drop? what is the frickin point.



Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 15:00:44


"She's not a member
Can't be butthurt by being called names.
"



 That's not the point.  Serowbot keeps saying it but the contempt for AOC precedes one's ability to understand other normal words placed into a normal sentence anyone else would understand.

 Don't make crude jokes, comments, remarks, innuendo, statements etc. that are specifically aimed at women.  Any women, as in every woman in the world.

 The forum mods don't want a ton of derogatory remarks about women.

 That's it.


Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 15:03:20


"Please someone explain to me the fcuking purpose of this part of the site."

 Ad revenue.  Communication about politics and religion.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/08/20 at 16:03:53

Ostensibly perhaps, but in fact? Not so much.

Ad revenue? I'd like to see the figures. It's pretty well avoided by almost all members, so that's not going to bring people here. I would suggest that it's going to do the opposite.

Communication? Well that's the ostensible point but as I think we can see there is no 'communication'. In fact even your stated aim of coming here to 'try to see the other side's point, is useless when there is no 'point' other than to deny reality. So you already know, there's nothing further to learn when the point is simply how strongly can people deny reality.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI4ueUtkRQ0[/media]

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 17:25:10


 Ad revenue? I'd like to see the figures. It's pretty well avoided by almost all members, so that's not going to bring people here. I would suggest that it's going to do the opposite.


 Ad revenue is not separate by section of forum.  It is overall page views and clicks on any page an advertisement exists.  On this forum that is every page.

 Why with all these banners anyone would think there is no Ad revenue is beyond me.  Recently another was added that redirects the page you selected to an ad.  There's a reason for that.

 Request the metrics from the site owner and see if he provides them.


"Communication? Well that's the ostensible point but as I think we can see there is no 'communication'. In fact even your stated aim of coming here to 'try to see the other side's point, is useless when there is no 'point' other than to deny reality. So you already know, there's nothing further to learn when the point is simply how strongly can people deny reality."

 That's not how I see it, but if it were true, I would still be interested in how it is being done.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Rockn on 11/08/20 at 17:36:53


5C7F426163787F76110 wrote:
[quote author=0E2E2C24392E4B0 link=1604797270/0#5 date=1604846151] . . .  Any adult should understand that the forum moderators are not willing to let insults towards women be posted consistently.  ...

So you are saying, the T.D.S. affected people,
that CONSTANTLY,
Posted numerous and frequently very despairing things about the P.O.T.U.S.
are perfectly OK,
in saying the disturbing things they have said.

OK, got-it ![/quote]

Please, one time just answer without any whataboutism.

This should be a non-issue for most people.

Would you be okay with the comments you made about AOC being said about your wife? Your mother? Your children?

Of course not. Being a public figure, even one you disagree with, doesn't open her up to disgusting vile comments like yours. I don't think you're a stupid person Mn, but trying to dig your heels in about being moderated for your comments about a woman is just sad. You know better. If someone commented here saying Melania's mouth was a phallic holster, I'd expect them to be reprimanded as well.

I see why so many Trump supporters here are upset. You see it in the comments about Harris currently. Trump gave you all a voice and validated this pathetic rhetoric about people you disagree with, and specifically women. Now you're just a group of losers screaming into the void again.  

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Matchless G11 on 11/08/20 at 17:42:09

So does the party of the left respect all woman including the unborn ones?

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Eegore on 11/08/20 at 18:01:48


"So does the party of the left respect all woman including the unborn ones?"


 I would say that calling unborn women derogatory terms would still be prohibited if that's what you are wondering.

 How else can we spin this to somehow make being respectful to women seem like a bad idea?  Is making fun of AOC this important?

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Serowbot on 11/08/20 at 18:24:27

The site owner has sole discretion on the layout of this site.
He created the TT to solve the problem of heated non-motorcycle discussion in the main body of our site.
It works.
The rest of the site is renowned as being both informative and inclusive.  
If we lose the TT... the world doesn't go away,... and I would expect some spillover into areas we want to keep tidy.

If you really don't like it here, don't click on it.
There are those here that need and enjoy this release.
I have created some very loose rules to follow and still allow maximum freedom of expression.
I don't think that's too much to ask.
Somebody has to,... so I did.

No personal attacks... and now, thanks to an unanticipated indiscretion... I must require a modicum of respect for women.
A line has been crossed.

I'm grateful to see some agreement here... that what I ask is not overstepping.



Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by WebsterMark on 11/08/20 at 19:22:17

As I’ve said before Sew, had Ann Coulter been the target, you wouldn’t have said a word. That’s a fact.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by eau de sauvage on 11/08/20 at 19:50:10

Thing is that no one does that to Coulter. I mean there's no need to because the verbiage that spews from her mouth, is ugly enough and speaks for itself.

I love the way that you invent scenarios as to what people will do, like you say, you're not going to honour your commitment to be honourable because in your omniscience you "know" that I would not have.

As I said and I'll say it again, I never expected you to and you've so far proved me right. I was just interested in exactly how you'd weasel out of it. But I really couldn't give a rat's whether you post here or not. If you wish to post go ahead, but please stop with the nauseating holier than thou attitude by saying how honourable you are that you certainly will honour your bet. Please stop telling people what you know that they would do as justification for anything you like. Just admit that you haven't, are not, and as we all see, never intended to, then we can move on. I don't want to collect on the bet. I hereby renounce all claims on collecting on the bet, hereto and forthwith. I issue this proclamation in the name of, and in respect to the fall of donald trump. Donald Trump who proudly proclaims he got more votes than any siting president, so I guess he's saying that he really is literally The Biggest Loser.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Matchless G11 on 11/09/20 at 03:10:03


4A6A68607D6A0F0 wrote:
"So does the party of the left respect all woman including the unborn ones?"


 I would say that calling unborn women derogatory terms would still be prohibited if that's what you are wondering.

 How else can we spin this to somehow make being respectful to women seem like a bad idea?  Is making fun of AOC this important?


Eegore,
If you look through my posts you will find that I have not disrespected AOC, I am making a point of the democratic party , who whines about disrespectful names when they have no problem with the slaughter of unborn women.  The ultimate form of disrespect.

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/20 at 04:52:53

The party of science does not consider a baby 5 minutes before birth separated by a couple inches of flesh, a human being. The exact equivalent of a 1 month old fetus discovered on Mars would result on worldwide shock and deep reflection on our place in the galaxy. On earth, it’s $500 bucks to Planned Parenthood and that life is in a bag on its way to the incinerator.


Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by MnSpring on 11/09/20 at 06:20:39


6A777B73766C707D70796F73180 wrote:
... Would you be okay with the comments you made about AOC being said about your wife? Your mother? Your children? ...

It's apparent then,
that you are, 'VERY', okay with,
the comments you, (and numerous others), made about the POTUS,
being said about your Husband, Father, Brother, Son !


... dig your heels in about being moderated for your comments about a woman ...

And you know well enough, it is all about,
'Do as I say, not as I do'
'You must, I don't have to'
'I can, you can't'

(AOC was simply the PU truck with a AR in the bed)


And NOT, having the balls to stand up and say.
"this forum will be ONE SIDED"

While all the time,
   pretending,
and make a big show about, 'fair'.

A well used and typical, UL, move.




 

Title: Re: That Lasted !
Post by Rockn on 11/09/20 at 10:31:54

You're a hoot Mn.

Yes, please, if any male relative or partner embodied the qualities of Trump et al, I would hope they'd be called out. You can't answer without pointing a finger back at someone else.

I remember a thread responding very similar to how you just did, and you had a cute reply about putting words in your mouth. Shocking, "Do as I say, not as I do". L.

Your defense of vile comments is that someone else made comments about your daddy Trump. It's hurts your feelings because you see yourself in him, and now he's a proven Loser.

This forum is far from one sided, or the posts of the regular crowd would have been silenced long ago. But go on about how you have it so bad while continually posting nonsense.

Take your big smiley L.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.