SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Science
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1570321741

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 10/05/19 at 17:29:00

Title: Science
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/05/19 at 17:29:00

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/global-warming-fraud-exposed-pictures

Nice quotes, too

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/global-warming-fraud-exposed-pictures

Title: Re: Science
Post by thumperclone on 10/06/19 at 07:53:11

more conspiracy carp

Title: Re: Science
Post by Ed L. on 10/06/19 at 10:27:54

https://climate.nasa.gov/

Title: Re: Science
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/19 at 11:29:54

Thank Gawd you found an unimpeachable source!
They even use IPCC BULLSHIT to prove the point.
If not for the fact that our government hasn't been proven to be lying most of the time, I might not believe it.
I'm totally on board now.

Title: Re: Science
Post by Serowbot on 10/06/19 at 13:10:00

We're in the age of facts as fast food...
If you don't like what they're serving, just get in a different line.

Title: Re: Science
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/19 at 13:29:09

You didn't bother to even look at what happened before 1979. Uhh, because the graph before then shines a light on the lies.

The Climategate emails bounced right off of you lefties..
The facts are what you say.
I WAS a believer, for a few years.
Why do you continue to believe the people who have not gotten ONE prediction right?
But I'M the idiot,,,

Title: Re: Science
Post by Serowbot on 10/06/19 at 14:22:05

I don't have to study data,..
I trust more educated scientists to interpret data.
They say climate is warming,.. and it is human caused.
The weight of your analysis against theirs is weak.
Zero Hedge is not a scientific journal,.. it's a Right-wing political site.

I would trust you over a climate scientist for advice on my brake pads...
Hope that's some consolation.

Title: Re: Science
Post by Eegore on 10/06/19 at 14:54:26

This is obviously confirmation bias. Very little source material is offered so these are "fact" because one wants them to be true since there isn't enough information offered to allow someone to do the math themselves.

Now to think nobody is adjusting numbers, or funding research to make more money off "climate change" is ridiculous. We all know people out there when given the tremendous amount of information needed to assess climate change will abuse that data to rake in cash.

Just running a climate study in a 70 mile area in my geographical location requires the analysis of over 2 million data points just to gain an average. It would be rather easy to become selective in what ones are "reported" so to speak. This is why I require blind study and nobody knows which weather models are from where, and which two are completely made up. Too easy to corrupt the data.

Title: Re: Science
Post by Serowbot on 10/06/19 at 15:19:06

Altered data... :-?

http://img.two-movies.name/forum_images/michael59_6491_16508260-7287191-image-a-70_1564087270359.jpg

Title: Re: Science
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/06/19 at 15:30:17

3A2C3B263E2B263D490 wrote:

What ROLE did Zero Hedge play in creating the article?
Zero..

Climategate?
Don't touch that..

You let
Scientists
Who have money at stake, grants, or no grants, tell you what to believe..
When other scientists have offered information easily understood that contradicts what you've been told.
And the people who have told you what to believe
the ones making the predictions
HAVEN'T BEEN RIGHT ONE FUKKING TIME.

But I'm the idiot..

Title: Re: Science
Post by MnSpring on 10/06/19 at 15:43:47

4F594E534B5E53483C0 wrote:

Altered data...
http://img.two-movies.name/forum_images/michael59_6491_16508260-7287191-image-a-70_1564087270359.jpg

Perfect example of what the likes of the UL FDS GBS's say.

"See See See, it says F ucked, See See See, Proof See See See"

Instead of logically, looking at a package, where the printing/hole punching, was off.
Then using logical determination to know it says, 'Packed'.

Yep, great example of a UL FDS GBS vs a normal Conservative.

Yes Bot, I know you posted that as a thing to be funny,
and on it's own it is, funny.

However, coupled with the topic.
It is a perfect example on how a UL FDS GBS thinks.

"See See See, PROOF, See See See"

Title: Re: Science
Post by thumperclone on 10/06/19 at 15:46:01

But I'm the idiot..[/quote]

finally you admit it
good job

Title: Re: Science
Post by WebsterMark on 10/07/19 at 05:33:03

I don't have to study data,..
I trust more educated scientists to interpret data. No, you trust the educated scientists that interpret data the way you want.
They say climate is warming,.. and it is human caused. Yes and yes. But the important questions are how much and how much. Those answers are unknown at this point and anyone who tells you otherwise is not truthful.