|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Thomas, USSC /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1560019879 Message started by NHLycan on 06/08/19 at 11:51:19 |
|
Title: Thomas, USSC Post by NHLycan on 06/08/19 at 11:51:19 I'm not sure it's possible to know the true authorship of USSC opinions. The consensus is that in our era, the clerks do most of the actual work of writing and reasoning. Those kids are smart. And ambitious. So the opinions the clerks .. let's use "draft", for the supremes are usually well written. Naturally there's variability between justices. Some take more of a direct hand than others. And some opinions are of greater significance or politically charged and require more polish than others. Which brings me to Justice Thomas's most recent opinion. It's a little strange. We already know he's pro-life. And passionately so. But this is like something out of a Infowars fever dream. It's conspiratorial, paranoid, angry, dishonest and poorly phrased. It suggests that black women have abortions in order to eliminate the black race. I'm not kidding. It's that weird and insular. And one suspects, written entirely by the justice himself. If clerks did have a hand in it, they may not have been the best and brightest. He comes across as the embarrassing uncle at Thanksgiving. He's become an intellect completely comfortable in right wing lunacy. Which is a kind of honesty if you think about it. He's ceased to care about being appropriate. I'd be uncomfortable sharing a meal with the gentleman at this point. He's coming unhinged in public. History generally calls out McReynolds as our worst justice in terms of personality. Justice Thomas may unseat him. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by raydawg on 06/08/19 at 17:44:38 Ever hear of Margaret Sanger? You might look her up, it also might help explain why Judge Thomas has a different take on it than a white guy, who BTW, men, are told its not our business anyway to decide the issue, maybe being white further disqualifies one, as well.....???? |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by Matchless G11 on 06/08/19 at 18:02:01 http://blackgenocide.org/archived_articles/negro.html Good read. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by Serowbot on 06/09/19 at 09:28:28 Hmmmm,.. just think,.. if all those black babies hadn't been aborted, there would be millions more Democrat voters today. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/09/19 at 13:44:30 5A5C586D77757A140 wrote:
Did you read his opinion or just The Washington Post article? |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by NHLycan on 06/10/19 at 14:27:03 Serowbot, given the structural obstacles in place to prevent non-whites from voting, I don't know that it would have much impact. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/10/19 at 15:56:20 "structural obstacles" .... Lets see, in your world view, the highest ranking black in the Judicial Branch is an idiot, so scary, you wouldn't even share a meal with him and other blacks are so freaking stupid and helpless, they can't figure out how to vote without your help. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by LostArtist on 06/10/19 at 16:21:39 192B2C3D3A2B3C032F3C254E0 wrote:
you read a lot into what people actually say... |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/10/19 at 18:20:19 Let's face it Lost; if I said the same things about a black liberal, I'm accused of racism. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by T And T Garage on 06/11/19 at 06:07:16 526067767160774864776E050 wrote:
Well mark, it's kind of tough not to hear your dog whistle - you blow it pretty hard. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/11/19 at 06:23:22 Are you calling me a racist? Racist: a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. Doesn't fit me. I don't think lessor of a person based solely on their skin color. I don't believe one race is inherently superior to another. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by T And T Garage on 06/11/19 at 06:26:54 142621303726310E223128430 wrote:
No, not directly. But your posts show that you use dog whistles. dog whis·tle noun - a high-pitched whistle used to train dogs, typically having a sound inaudible to humans. - a subtly aimed political message which is intended for, and can only be understood by, a particular group. Your post regarding the shooting in St. Louis is a perfect example. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by pg on 06/11/19 at 07:22:40 WM, they use political correctness to stifle discourse. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/11/19 at 07:23:49 I think you're hearing things you want to hear. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by WebsterMark on 06/11/19 at 07:24:40 5B4C4A4649592B0 wrote:
Of course, afraid of the ramifications that happen when truth is acknowledged. |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by T And T Garage on 06/11/19 at 10:55:11 625057464150477854475E350 wrote:
No, I don't think so. I may have been born on a Saturday, but it wasn't last Saturday... |
|
Title: Re: Thomas, USSC Post by T And T Garage on 06/11/19 at 10:56:00 407275646372655A76657C170 wrote:
Of course, afraid of the ramifications that happen when truth is acknowledged.[/quote] Well, there you go again. What do you mean "the truth"? The truth in what? |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |