SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> “In purely journalistic terms,
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1556637292

Message started by raydawg on 04/30/19 at 08:14:52

Title: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by raydawg on 04/30/19 at 08:14:52

this is an epic disaster.”

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/31/18286902/trump-mueller-report-russia-matt-taibbi

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Who here believed this stuff?

They musta been really insane :-* :-* :-* :-*

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 04/30/19 at 08:18:23

25362E33362030570 wrote:

Hey there ray, you may want to look at the byline of this story, and the date in particular....

This "fantastic" article came out before the report was released.

Womp womp.....

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by raydawg on 04/30/19 at 08:20:07

AND...you had the writing on the wall, and STILL chose to believe it its voracity.

The date changes nothing but perhaps showing how astute the author is.

Next.

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 04/30/19 at 08:27:05

32213924213727400 wrote:

AND...you had the writing on the wall, and STILL chose to believe it its voracity.

The "writing on the wall" was by a trump ally. Even you can't be that stupid. There are 10 points where trump obstructed justice. The House is probably going to pursue another investigation - if not impeachment.

The date changes nothing but perhaps showing how astute the author is.
Oh, it does. See my comment above.

Next.

Well, next is the House organizing another investigation and/or impeachment.

Oh, and next time, pay attention to the byline of your articles... :D

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by raydawg on 04/30/19 at 08:40:41

Bet your friend Web then......

Forget about skin, how bouts you sport a sack? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 04/30/19 at 10:54:07

12011904011707600 wrote:

Bet your friend Web then......

Forget about skin, how bouts you sport a sack? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

For all you know ray, I might be in recovery of a gambling addiction.

Go have a beer ray.

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/30/19 at 11:06:41

There are 10 points where trump obstructed justice.

BULLSHIT

I POSTED that list.
And it's not
Obstruction.
It's what insane, hyperventilating liars want to
Pretend is obstruction.

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 04/30/19 at 11:12:31

657A7C7B6661506050687A763D0F0 wrote:

There are 10 points where trump obstructed justice.

BULLSHIT

I POSTED that list.
And it's not
Obstruction.
It's what insane, hyperventilating liars want to
Pretend is obstruction.

- Says the same guy who believed that Sandy Hook was faked and vaccinations cause autism....

For reference:

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/439517-here-are-the-10-episodes-mueller-probed-for-potential-obstruction-by

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/30/19 at 16:56:59

And yet, ZERO charges.
SAYING
Gee, I hope you can go easy on Flynn,he's a good guy.
Isn't obstruction.
He didn't Take any ACTION that would PREVENT Flynn from being prosecuted.
That would have been
Obstruction.

Deleting emails that had been subpoenaed
THAT'S obstruction.

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 05/01/19 at 05:52:09

352A2C2B3631003000382A266D5F0 wrote:

And yet, ZERO charges. - YET.
SAYING
Gee, I hope you can go easy on Flynn,he's a good guy.
Isn't obstruction.
He didn't Take any ACTION that would PREVENT Flynn from being prosecuted.
That would have been
Obstruction.

Deleting emails that had been subpoenaed
THAT'S obstruction.

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by MnSpring on 05/01/19 at 09:43:23

6C727D7C716C776A180 wrote:

next is the House organizing another investigation and/or impeachment.

Are you allowed to reveal your source of information, that you know the above ?
Or, is it just a absolute certainty declared by you ?
Or, is it just a W.A.G. ?

Title: Re: “In purely journalistic terms,
Post by T And T Garage on 05/01/19 at 10:54:27

63407D5E5C4740492E0 wrote:

[quote author=6C727D7C716C776A180 link=1556637292/0#3 date=1556638025] next is the House organizing another investigation and/or impeachment.

Are you allowed to reveal your source of information, that you know the above ?
Or, is it just a absolute certainty declared by you ?
Or, is it just a W.A.G. ?
[/quote]

I'm not allowed to name my informants.....