SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Blexit
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1554900833

Message started by WebsterMark on 04/10/19 at 05:53:53

Title: Blexit
Post by WebsterMark on 04/10/19 at 05:53:53

Argue against it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmuFIM4meXg

Title: Re: Blexit
Post by Eegore on 04/10/19 at 16:13:42

Need more details.

Argue against what? That she made the speech? That the claims were accurate?

Title: Re: Blexit
Post by LostArtist on 04/10/19 at 16:30:21

what things is she advocating for for black people?

so, she says she was never told that she couldn't do anything because she was black, then goes on to state how pathetic black education is ....

because here's the thing.... individually, yes, in America, you can do anything you want regardless of any systemic bias, does that make that systemic bias okay? she says no... that's what liberals and democrats have been saying....

and she's spreading division herself, with this "Blexit" movement, that's it's whole point.....

now do democrats need to a much much much better job at actually doing things that actually work for black Americans, absolutely, and the new trend of small donors instead of a few rich donors is step one. and thats ONLY happening on the democrat side, the republicans are still very very very happy to take billionaires' money and to their bidding.

Title: Re: Blexit
Post by pg on 04/11/19 at 03:43:14

795A46417447415C4641350 wrote:

what things is she advocating for for black people?

To not be viewed as a victim, she believes in self-determination. Here is another clip, she is a tough cookie.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGVdD_QxuEc[/media]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGVdD_QxuEc

Best regards,

Title: Re: Blexit
Post by Eegore on 04/11/19 at 05:32:59

I like her philosophy but she isn't the brightest.

During a discussion on climate change she said she didn't think the evidence from Scientific American "was real" because its a "dot com" website and not "dot org". The logic is .com is for profit.

Even though .org can be for profit, there is no regulation to it.

Also I don't think talking really fast makes one sound intelligent.