SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Lefty shuffle
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1545944922

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 12/27/18 at 13:08:42

Title: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/27/18 at 13:08:42

Dupe the people
Steal the election

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/reid_hoffman_apologizes_for_funding_antigop_effort_in_al_senate_race.html


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/reid_hoffman_apologizes_for_funding_antigop_effort_in_al_senate_race.html

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by MnSpring on 12/28/18 at 09:50:35


3D2224233E3908380830222E65570 wrote:
Dupe the people
Steal the election
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/reid_hoffman_apologizes_for_funding_antigop_effort_in_al_senate_race.html
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/reid_hoffman_apologizes_for_funding_antigop_effort_in_al_senate_race.html


Did you expect, ANY, UL to actually read that ?
Let alone any response to it !




Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Eegore on 12/28/18 at 10:12:37

"Did you expect, ANY, UL to actually read that ?
Let alone any response to it!"


 Do you reply to every question or article posted?

 

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/28/18 at 10:48:57

Of course not.
But it's fun watching the truth come out.
I'm sure it's not a problem for the lefties, because the end justified the means. As long as Moore is destroyed, however dishonestly it was accomplished doesn't matter.

But I'm just sure all the Bullshit about Trump is true.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Serowbot on 12/28/18 at 12:02:04

Gee, that's equally as bad as what the Trump campaign did.
I'm equally outraged.
You?... ::)

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Ed L. on 12/28/18 at 16:44:49

"American Thinker (affectionately nicknamed "American Stinker" by its fans) is an online wingnut publication that's more or less the poor man's WND or Newsmax. They've published articles by such conservative luminaries as Noel Sheppard (NewsBusters) and Pamela Geller and such climate "experts" as S. Fred Singer and Christopher Monckton, as well as an interview with (and hagiography of) white nationalist Jared Taylor.[2]

The magazine, of course, is chock-full of right-wing conspiracy theories, woo, and pseudoscience. On the conspiracy side, they promote birtherism, "creeping sharia," red-baiting, and still occasionally prattle on about Vince Foster. On the science side, they concentrate on creationism and global warming denialism."

A Direct Quote From Rational WIKI

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Eegore on 12/28/18 at 17:21:28


 We have brought up questionable source information repeatedly and while it is typically ignored it was established on the last one that the criteria for accuracy is to be exclusively content related and not source related.

 That is unless of course the information is not what certain people want to hear, then the source is part of the equation.  But in this case we should look strictly at the accuracy of the article itself, so good luck finding corroborating evidence because these types of articles typically won't cite their evidence for people to cross-reference.

 In this case the question will be what part of the article itself is inaccurate?

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Ed L. on 12/28/18 at 17:44:27

We have brought up questionable source information repeatedly and while it is typically ignored it was established on the last one that the criteria for accuracy is to be exclusively content related and not source related.

I thought EVERYTHING was fair game on the P/R, no rules or restrictions.

Didn't know that, just acting like Trump who discredits the source and ignores the content. A wingnut is a wingnut with or without collaboration.

JFnC, you are taking the fun out of crumpling all the tin foil hats.

I'll stay away for now. ;)  


Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/28/18 at 21:08:18

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/alabama-dirty-tricksters-invited-a-new-york-times-reporter

Waiting for CNN to confirm may take a while

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by WebsterMark on 12/29/18 at 06:53:29


00211A096B450 wrote:
"American Thinker (affectionately nicknamed "American Stinker" by its fans) is an online wingnut publication that's more or less the poor man's WND or Newsmax. They've published articles by such conservative luminaries as Noel Sheppard (NewsBusters) and Pamela Geller and such climate "experts" as S. Fred Singer and Christopher Monckton, as well as an interview with (and hagiography of) white nationalist Jared Taylor.[2]

The magazine, of course, is chock-full of right-wing conspiracy theories, woo, and pseudoscience. On the conspiracy side, they promote birtherism, "creeping sharia," red-baiting, and still occasionally prattle on about Vince Foster. On the science side, they concentrate on creationism and global warming denialism."

A Direct Quote From Rational WIKI


Attacking  the source's credibility makes any uncomfortable issues go away. So I guess I should attack Rational Wiki huh Ed?

Didn't a major reporter whose articles were published in virtually every major publication (not to mention CNN) just get fired when it was discovered he made up sources and stories that confirmed his left leaning ideology? Wasn't he named journalist of the yesr? Hmmm... If you hadn't hesrd that before, I wonder why?

News has turned into left vs right. Neither side is immune from bias.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Eegore on 12/29/18 at 14:15:22

"News has turned into left vs right. Neither side is immune from bias. "

 I agree with this but I do not think the quantitative values are the same.  For instance when CNN, or most modern American "mainstream" news outlets make a false or mistaken statement or release of information it is usually quickly fact checked and found false or accurate easily.  

 This is due to release of source information in most cases, however other means of verification are utilized.  

 Some however release statements only with zero source information, making the verification of statements difficult if not impossible.  This only delays the inevitable proving of incorrect information, and quite simply some news sources produce unverifiable and inaccurate stories on a regular basis, as in weekly or daily.

 So yes there is bias, and yes all news sources will fail to provide absolute accurate information but some just cater to their viewership numbers and lie consistently or at a minimum never bother to fact-check before they release information.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by WebsterMark on 12/30/18 at 05:49:30

Oh please.....CNN has been on a 2 year crusade to get rid of an elected President and are most responsible for the phrase fake news.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by WebsterMark on 12/30/18 at 05:54:00

As evidence, CNN ran a "news" segment how Trump's use of the phrase "witch hunt " is offending witches. Seriously?

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/30/18 at 08:57:20

agree with this but I do not think the quantitative values are the same.  For instance when CNN, or most modern American "mainstream" news outlets make a false or mistaken statement or release of information it is usually quickly fact checked and found false or accurate easily.  

I'd bet a ton you could pass a polygraph on that. You ACTUALLY believe that crap.
Even though
It's been amply demonstrated that CNN was LYING, Know what they were doing, and KEPT ON DOING IT, milking the lefty Butthurtedness it created and the ratings that went with it.

They find FACTS, they twist them and torture them until they are unrecognizable, and then use them to further the agenda.
If you're investing time in a broadcast news outlet, you're sucking the stupid down. None of them are worth a crap.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by thumperclone on 12/30/18 at 09:12:06


They find FACTS, they twist them and torture them until they are unrecognizable, and then use them to further the agenda.
None of them are worth a crap.[/quote]

same can be said of your sources

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by Serowbot on 12/30/18 at 09:15:26

They even went to court,.. claiming they weren't journalists, they were entertainers, and their programs weren't news, they were opinion shows...
...so they had the right to report non-facts... Lies...
Oh wait no,... that was Fox News... ::)

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by MnSpring on 12/30/18 at 09:57:27


5046514C54414C57230 wrote:
They even went to court,.. claiming they weren't journalists, they were entertainers, and their programs weren't news, they were opinion shows...  ...so they had the right to report non-facts... Lies...

So that worked, for the late night talk show people,
who are clearly TDS affected.
Like the ones that tt, eds,  quote as sacrosanct.


Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by T And T Garage on 12/30/18 at 10:22:22


61427F5C5E45424B2C0 wrote:
[quote author=5046514C54414C57230 link=1545944922/15#15 date=1546190126]They even went to court,.. claiming they weren't journalists, they were entertainers, and their programs weren't news, they were opinion shows...  ...so they had the right to report non-facts... Lies...

So that worked, for the late night talk show people,
who are clearly TDS affected.
Like the ones that tt, eds,  quote as sacrosanct.
[/quote]
LMAO - you use a word like "sacrosanct" and yet don't know the difference between "there", "they're" and "their".

Have you been watching big boy TV?

;D

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/30/18 at 10:32:59


697568706D786F7E717273781D0 wrote:
They find FACTS, they twist them and torture them until they are unrecognizable, and then use them to further the agenda.
None of them are worth a crap.


same can be said of your sources
[/quote]

And yet, I continue to be correct, while you, ehh, Notsomuch.



Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/30/18 at 10:35:05


5A4C5B465E4B465D290 wrote:
They even went to court,.. claiming they weren't journalists, they were entertainers, and their programs weren't news, they were opinion shows...
...so they had the right to report non-facts... Lies...
Oh wait no,... that was Fox News... ::)


Maybe you missed the part about
If you're investing time in ANY BROADCAST NEWS SOURCE, you're sucking stupid.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by thumperclone on 12/30/18 at 10:36:12

clearly TDS affected.


[/quote]

any sensible thinking person is TDS affected
only the obtuse and brainwashed can support tweety  

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by MnSpring on 12/31/18 at 09:51:10


6A766B736E7B6C7D7271707B1E0 wrote:
only the obtuse and brainwashed can support tweety  

O.M.G. You are SO, Racist !

Just because I support many things that Trump has done.
YOU, call me “…obtuse and brainwashed…”.
How DARE you !

You said: “…dont call me an ul…”
Bot told me not to call, snowflakes, ’Snowflakes’.

YET,  it is perfectly OK,
to call me, (and a WHOLE bunch of other people)
“…obtuse and brainwashed…”

So, does this mean that a, UL, Snowflake, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You singer.
Can say ANYTHING they want.
And a Right of center person, is, FORBIDDEN,
from calling a;
UL, Snowflake, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You singer,
a,  “UL, Snowflake, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You singer” ?

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by thumperclone on 12/31/18 at 10:16:56

I did not name you specifically so there is no personal attack but

if the shoe fits wear it

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by MnSpring on 12/31/18 at 10:43:44


425E435B465344555A595853360 wrote:
I did not name you specifically so there is no personal attack but if the shoe fits wear it

Really ?

JFK: I would have supported many of the things he did/said if I were of age to vote.
Bush/Bush: Supported some of the things they did.
Reagan: Supported most of the things he did.
Carter/Obama: Can’t remember supporting anything they did.
(Well except peanut farming)
Trump: Support many things.

So you saying: “only the obtuse and brainwashed can support tweety”
(And , ‘tweety’  is your word for the current POTUS)
And me saying, many, many, many, many times,
I support the current POTUS.

Exactly how, is: “only the obtuse and brainwashed can support tweety”
NOT,
describing me, and the MAJORITY, of CITIZENS of this Nation ?


Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by thumperclone on 01/02/19 at 05:03:18

the majority are against trump

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by MnSpring on 01/02/19 at 09:00:47


3A263B233E2B3C2D2221202B4E0 wrote:
the majority are against trump

So then, you believe Christine Ford, (aka, Anitta Hill), Ramirez, Swetnick,
and don’t forget the, ‘accusation’ by a anonymous letter.

Are 100% correct then.
Right !

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by T And T Garage on 01/02/19 at 09:31:51


486B5675776C6B62050 wrote:
[quote author=3A263B233E2B3C2D2221202B4E0 link=1545944922/15#24 date=1546434198]the majority are against trump

So then, you believe Christine Ford, (aka, Anitta Hill), Ramirez, Swetnick,
and don’t forget the, ‘accusation’ by a anonymous letter.

Are 100% correct then.
Right !
[/quote]


One has nothing to do with the other.

Polls show how much your boy is disliked by America.

Title: Re: Lefty shuffle
Post by LostArtist on 01/03/19 at 12:16:41


6D7274736E6958685860727E35070 wrote:
[quote author=5A4C5B465E4B465D290 link=1545944922/15#15 date=1546190126]They even went to court,.. claiming they weren't journalists, they were entertainers, and their programs weren't news, they were opinion shows...
...so they had the right to report non-facts... Lies...
Oh wait no,... that was Fox News... ::)


Maybe you missed the part about
If you're investing time in ANY BROADCAST NEWS SOURCE, you're sucking stupid.
[/quote]


yeah because those darkweb sites that aren't transparent in their researching techniques and constantly LIE are just so much better.....

question everything, otherwise you're just as much a chump as any CNN fanboy


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.