|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> A New Low For fox /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1543522411 Message started by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 12:13:31 |
|
Title: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 12:13:31 Anyone remember mark fuhrman? No? Well, he's a confirmed racist. 100%. And he just got a new show on fox's little online space... How about that? Any bubs care to protest? (probably not) http://www.thewrap.com/mark-fuhrman-fox-nation-racist-ex-la-cop-oj-simpson-trial/ |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by Serowbot on 11/29/18 at 14:33:57 I'm confident they can go lower. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/29/18 at 14:43:46 Could anyone get lower that the network that gave racist Al Sharpton a show? The man who instigate a riot, a man that got someone killed? |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 14:46:16 4E7C7B6A6D7C6B54786B72190 wrote:
Um, yeah. They could hire mark fuhrman. See how that works? |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 14:46:40 2234233E26333E25510 wrote:
Sadly, you're probably right. I guess we'll see. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 14:59:07 I have to say - I find it funny (odd, not ha-ha) that whenever I post a story like this, all I get from the cons is either silence or whataboutisms. The easiest response from a conservative would be "Yeah, they made a mistake - thank goodness they have other, better talent there. He probably won't last anyway". But no - I get a mention of al sharpton (who I have, on many occasions, bashed for his racist views). What does that say about the typical conservatives on here? It tells me that - no matter what, they will stick to party over people. This fuhrman POS is a perfect example. There's no question he's a racist. It's easy to find the proof. Yet instead of agreeing with a perfectly cogent response, they defend and deflect. "If he works for fox, then he must be good". Party above all else. How pathetic. I gladly denounce al sharpton. I think he's an idiot. He does no good for anyone except himself and his moronic followers. I'm surprised that he's still on, quite honestly. But you'll never hear that from a conservative about fox or cnbc or brieghtbart or rush. At least, I have yet to hear it. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/29/18 at 15:18:39 STFU. Your entire persona is whataboutism, Mr Hypocrisy so say whatever..... |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by MnSpring on 11/29/18 at 16:02:23 243A353439243F22500 wrote:
WOW, tt believes that the totally racist Al Sharpton. Is Better than, a person who was racist, against a Murderer ? Apparently, Cenk Uygur, told you to say that. Because no rational person would ever think that. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by MnSpring on 11/29/18 at 16:09:01 607E71707D607B66140 wrote:
Well not so surprising, that ANOTHER LIE comes from the tt. PROVE, the, ‘typical conservatives on here’, have said; “If he works for fox, then he must be good" in referring to Fuhrman. Golllllleeeeyyyy GEEEEEEEEEE Another tt lie. But, got to give the tt some slack, after all, Cenk Uygur, told him to say that ! |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 18:32:12 605255444352457A56455C370 wrote:
You think? Hmmm - I'd say you're dead wrong. All you have to o is look at your posts compared to mine. Like I said, all you had to do was agree - but no. You'd rather have a proven racist on your side than side with sanity. Well, he goes good with all the white nationalists and other racists, so I guess it's fitting. Enjoy your ignorance mark. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 18:36:23 7E5D6043415A5D54330 wrote:
WOW, tt believes that the totally racist Al Sharpton. Is Better than, a person who was racist, against a Murderer ? First off, I'm not talking or comparing al sharpton here. This is only about fuhrman. mark's the one who brought up sharpton - that's what's called "whataboutism". This POS fuhrman is a proven racist. You're on his side mn? Are you? Apparently, Cenk Uygur, told you to say that. Because no rational person would ever think that. [/quote] Think what? That fuhrman is a racist? There's loads of proof out there mn. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/29/18 at 18:41:11 4764597A7863646D0A0 wrote:
Well not so surprising, that ANOTHER LIE comes from the tt. PROVE, the, ‘typical conservatives on here’, have said; “If he works for fox, then he must be good" in referring to Fuhrman. I'm citing an example of thought mn - are you really that stupid? Hey, maybe the next time you post, you show us proof of the "kumbaya" singers, hmm? Golllllleeeeyyyy GEEEEEEEEEE Another tt lie. But, got to give the tt some slack, after all, Cenk Uygur, told him to say that ! [/quote] Seems you have a thing for Cenk. You should probably bring that up to him, not me. But I have to say again, your ridiculous posts sure do set the standard for the typical conservative on here. You do them proud! Keep up the great work! |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by MnSpring on 11/30/18 at 08:18:03 657B747578657E63110 wrote:
This statement, rather sums things up. 2 people, one 20% left, one 20% right, (+/-), of center. Discuss a subject, they don’t agree on. But they still have a beer/Coke burger together. A person that is 20% to the left, of the left. Well, if you don’t agree with that person, than you are Clearly, a …, …, …, … |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 08:39:54 72516C4F4D5651583F0 wrote:
This statement, rather sums things up. 2 people, one 20% left, one 20% right, (+/-), of center. Discuss a subject, they don’t agree on. But they still have a beer/Coke burger together. A person that is 20% to the left, of the left. Well, if you don’t agree with that person, than you are Clearly, a …, …, …, … [/quote] Not even close mn. This isn't a debatable point. mark fuhrman is a confirmed, on the record racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuhrman_tapes There is no "middle ground". So, in my opinion, if you side with fuhrman, then you're no better. It's like saying "Yeah, that hitler - terrible murderer, but boy, his cupcakes were awesome! He wasn't all bad". No! It doesn't work that way. There are no "good racists". There are no "good kkk members". There are no "good nazis". |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by verslagen1 on 11/30/18 at 08:52:55 Those tapes are 30 years old, what have you got that's recent? |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/30/18 at 11:55:56 If I knew of a decent news outlet I would be watching it. They all suck. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:21:38 32213637282523212A75440 wrote:
They still hold true - I haven't seen any evidence in the contrary. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:22:17 6B747275686F5E6E5E66747833010 wrote:
Which is probably why you had no idea that trump has played more golf in 2 years than obama did in 6. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/30/18 at 12:27:35 Basketball |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by MnSpring on 11/30/18 at 12:29:27 766867666B766D70020 wrote:
http://https://media.giphy.com/media/26DMY97bbWG6V6KFW/giphy.gif |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:36:24 I don't understand your post mn. Are you saying that I'm wrong? Are you just a fan of the guy with the puppets? What? |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:37:13 Oh wait - that's you with the guy's hand up your a$$! NOW I GET IT!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:38:49 524D4B4C51566757675F4D410A380 wrote:
And your point is what? That Obama was in better shape than trump because he played basketball in the am with his staff - then, well, OK! |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 12:44:46 post removed - too easy |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by verslagen1 on 11/30/18 at 13:56:28 2E303F3E332E35285A0 wrote:
They still hold true - I haven't seen any evidence in the contrary. [/quote] Meaning you haven't seen any evidence, good or bad. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by T And T Garage on 11/30/18 at 14:04:35 22312627383533313A65540 wrote:
They still hold true - I haven't seen any evidence in the contrary. [/quote] Meaning you haven't seen any evidence, good or bad.[/quote] Meaning I haven't seen any evidence that would exonerate his actions of the past. He's a liar - he lied on the stand. (If his history didn't precede him, it's very possible that oj would have gone to jail) I don't find him at all appealing. I think it's a poor choice/judgement that fox hired this guy for their online network. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by verslagen1 on 11/30/18 at 14:49:22 5C424D4C415C475A280 wrote:
They still hold true - I haven't seen any evidence in the contrary. [/quote] Meaning you haven't seen any evidence, good or bad.[/quote] Meaning I haven't seen any evidence that would exonerate his actions of the past. He's a liar - he lied on the stand. (If his history didn't precede him, it's very possible that oj would have gone to jail) I don't find him at all appealing. I think it's a poor choice/judgement that fox hired this guy for their online network.[/quote] You are too much like our president. |
|
Title: Re: A New Low For fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/30/18 at 15:53:47 You are too much like our president. You're too correct. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |