SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1532504448

Message started by eau de sauvage on 07/25/18 at 00:40:48

Title: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/25/18 at 00:40:48

Should I pay with cash or cheque?

https://www.vox.com/2018/7/24/17610584/tape-michael-cohen-trump-payoff-playboy-model-karen-mcdougal-recording

“I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend David,” Cohen says to Trump on the recording. Cohen is apparently referring to American Media Inc. chief David Pecker.

A clear violation of campaign finance law, at least. This is the tip of the iceberg that Team Trump's ship will run into over the next year.

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by Eegore on 07/25/18 at 05:58:25

This isn't about Stormy Daniels but nice attempt at a clever title.

This is about Karen McDougal.

Too bad she got caught up in this, she's really attractive and not a bonehead, I met her a few years after she got the PotY recognition.

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by raydawg on 07/25/18 at 10:09:33

Maybe if they paid in rubles ;D

You didn’t read the story in the Gardian did you?

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by Serowbot on 07/25/18 at 13:12:31

Why does a lawyer record a conversation with a client?...
CYA...

If you need to do that,... there's trouble.
More recordings to come... that's more trouble.

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by raydawg on 07/25/18 at 13:23:24

4F594E534B5E53483C0 wrote:

Why does a lawyer record a conversation with a client?...
CYA...

If you need to do that,... there's trouble.
More recordings to come... that's more trouble.

Yes, they will kick him out and put Hillary in his place cuz she got 3 million more votes ;D

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by verslagen1 on 07/25/18 at 13:25:03

If he recorded in secret, he's in trouble for that by itself.

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by eau de sauvage on 07/25/18 at 13:56:18

7B687F7E616C6A68633C0D0 wrote:

If he recorded in secret, he's in trouble for that by itself.

Not in NYC, where the law only requires that one party to the conversation give consent even if that one party is the person who did the recording, so no he's not in trouble for taping the conversation.

5C7C7E766B7C190 wrote:

This isn't about Stormy Daniels but nice attempt at a clever title.
This is about Karen McDougal.

Yeah it know but as you said I could not resist the title, plus Stormy can be a sort of generic stand in for all the women in a similar position.

6670677A62777A61150 wrote:

Why does a lawyer record a conversation with a client?...
CYA...
If you need to do that,... there's trouble.
More recordings to come... that's more trouble.

Well Trump is not your average client, if a lawyer is performing illegal actions but having his arm twisted... I could think of many reasons why he'd want to cover his ass.

Title: Re: A Storm[y] in a D-Cup
Post by faffi on 07/25/18 at 13:57:20

Here, you can legally record a conversation without telling anyone as long as you are an active part of the conversation taking place.