SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you should
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1509636324

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 11/02/17 at 08:25:24

Title: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you should
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/02/17 at 08:25:24

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

I had been wondering why it was that I couldn’t write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn. Well, here was the answer.

When the party chooses the nominee, the custom is that the candidate’s team starts to exercise more control over the party. If the party has an incumbent candidate, as was the case with Clinton in 1996 or Obama in 2012, this kind of arrangement is seamless because the party already is under the control of the president. When you have an open contest without an incumbent and competitive primaries, the party comes under the candidate’s control only after the nominee is certain. When I was manager of Gore’s campaign in 2000, we started inserting our people into the DNC in June. This victory fund agreement, however, had been signed in August 2015, just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and nearly a year before she officially had the nomination.


I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, but I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff. I had gone department by department, investigating individual conduct for evidence of skewed decisions, and I was happy to see that I had found none. Then I found this agreement.


The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.

***


I had to keep my promise to Bernie. I was in agony as I dialed him. Keeping this secret was against everything that I stood for, all that I valued as a woman and as a public servant.

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.”


I discussed the fundraising agreement that each of the candidates had signed. Bernie was familiar with it, but he and his staff ignored it. They had their own way of raising money through small donations. I described how Hillary’s campaign had taken it another step.
I told Bernie I had found Hillary’s Joint Fundraising Agreement. I explained that the cancer was that she had exerted this control of the party long before she became its nominee. Had I known this, I never would have accepted the interim chair position, but here we were with only weeks before the election.


Bernie took this stoically. He did not yell or express outrage. Instead he asked me what I thought Hillary’s chances were. The polls were unanimous in her winning but what, he wanted to know, was my own assessment?


I had to be frank with him. I did not trust the polls, I said. I told him I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere.


told Bernie I had found Hillary’s Joint Fundraising Agreement. I explained that the cancer was that she had exerted this control of the party long before she became its nominee. Had I known this, I never would have accepted the interim chair position, but here we were with only weeks before the election.

Ohhh it's a revealing read

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by WebsterMark on 11/02/17 at 08:53:34

I never buy books like this cause most of the time they're sanitized bull$hit like Hilary's last nonsense, but Politico published a long section and I might get this one. The reason is it's written very well. It's written like normal people would write, not dancing around topics. So far from what I've read, there's no pu$$yfooting.

And Hilary is coming off like a witch every more so than any of us imagined.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/02/17 at 10:09:25

Hilary is coming off like a witch every more so than any of us imagined

Well, you might be right to a certain extent, but my wife was never fooled by that woman.
I had never seen her get so emotionally involved over a political candidate before, never..... she couldn't stand her, wasn't fooled at all.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/02/17 at 10:57:33

Aaand lefties go running.
Probably pouring bleach in their eyes, trying to unsee the facts that should make them think.
Libya...

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/02/17 at 17:08:17


554A4C4B5651605060584A460D3F0 wrote:
Aaand lefties go running.
Probably pouring bleach in their eyes, trying to unsee the facts that should make them think.
Libya...


Not sure why Donna fed Hillary the questions/answers, other than she too believed Hillary would win and she desired to live.

Why would Hillary even hafta cheat....
I thought she was the smartest woman this side of God  ;D

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/02/17 at 19:08:43

t sure why Donna fed Hillary the questions/answers, other than she too believed Hillary would win and she desired to live.

I wonder if that little detail is in the book.
Exposing corruption is she?
Or isn't that unethical?


Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/02/17 at 20:17:04


697670776A6D5C6C5C64767A31030 wrote:
t sure why Donna fed Hillary the questions/answers, other than she too believed Hillary would win and she desired to live.

I wonder if that little detail is in the book.
Exposing corruption is she?
Or isn't that unethical?


Only if you get caught.....

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/02/17 at 20:40:03

She's caught

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/03/17 at 07:36:37

agreement, according to Brazile, “specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics and mailings.”

Forget for a moment the unfairness to Sanders that would characterize the next year as he surged against Clinton. What role might this agreement have played in Biden’s decision-making? Did he know? Did Hillary tell him? Did President Barack Obama tell him? Did Biden realize he would be fighting not only Clinton but the entire apparatus of his own party and decide to bag it?


The Pustule leaves a trail wherever it goes.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/03/17 at 07:46:43

Sorry, fellas. The 2016 election was the culmination, not the beginning, of a Democratic implosion.

MORE ON:
DONNA BRAZILE

Trump urges probe on Hillary's DNC 'collusion'

Ex-DNC chair reveals how Clinton 'rigged' Dem primary

Donna Brazile admits she sent town-hall questions to Clinton camp

Keep crying wolf about Trump, and no one will listen when there's a real crisis
Over the previous six years, Democrats had lost 60-plus House seats, nine Senate seats, 14 governorships and 1,000 state and local offices. Russians didn’t do that. Democrats did — with the help of a surging Republican Party that found itself after election night in its strongest electoral position across the country since 1928.
Democrats need to understand their own role in their own rotting position — including how they sold themselves to the Clintons for a mess of pottage they never even got to eat — if they are to have any hope of reversing the Republican tide.

Even if their fantasies were made flesh today and Donald Trump were somehow banished from Washington, the Democratic Party would be in no stronger institutional shape than it was yesterday.


Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/05/17 at 10:47:00

If CNN can admit it, surely you can...

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/11/03/cnn-sadly-breaks-news-viewers-yes-hillary-clinton-rigged-election-557159

How is it the perpetually wrong choose to not learn ?
FAce it.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/11/03/cnn-sadly-breaks-news-viewers-yes-hillary-clinton-rigged-election-557159

The Pustule strikes

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/05/17 at 11:10:57

By not addressing these issues, it will cost the democrats 2018.

This is why Trump even won, its a vote against the liberal news, as much as anything else.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/05/17 at 11:52:03

You seem to see it as left and right.
Trump beat a whole range of bubs before her.
He's president because people like me outnumber the idiots.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/05/17 at 14:19:37

Yeah, I get that, but those were the horses that didn't even make it to the gate.

I think that 20% in the "middle" who normally decide the outcome, the sway vote, is indeed getting larger than 20%......

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/05/17 at 15:13:06

They ran head to head in the PRIMARIES. He beat establishment politicians.
Because enough people are sick of status quo.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/05/17 at 15:41:59


382721263B3C0D3D0D35272B60520 wrote:
They ran head to head in the PRIMARIES. He beat establishment politicians.
Because enough people are sick of status quo.


I AGREE......

Why you picking on me.....????

I ain't Bot, I can reason  ;D

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/05/17 at 15:43:35

Brazile even pointed out that Bernie was more popular than Clinton, saying: “I did not trust the polls. I told [Sanders] I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere...

IOW, the polls were an attempt to create an illusion that she popular, Hoping to get weak minded followers to vote for her.
Like I said at the time.
Right
Again

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by raydawg on 11/05/17 at 16:16:44


3D2224233E3908380830222E65570 wrote:
Brazile even pointed out that Bernie was more popular than Clinton, saying: “I did not trust the polls. I told [Sanders] I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere...

IOW, the polls were an attempt to create an illusion that she popular, Hoping to get weak minded followers to vote for her.
Like I said at the time.
Right
Again


I think Web was the only one that believed Trump would win...
I don't remember you staking such a claim.

Anyway, back to Donna.

Her latest remark to Mook and company:

Donna Brazile's scathing review of Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential campaign sent more shock waves this weekend through the Democratic Party, with members eager to bury the Clinton era ahead of Tuesday’s key Virginia governor’s race and other upcoming elections.

“Those telling me to shut up … I tell them, 'Go to hell.' I’m gonna tell my story,” Brazile, who ran the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 White House race, on Sunday told ABC’s “This Week.


Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/05/17 at 16:20:22

I expected them to steal it for her.
They couldn't.
He won
YUGE.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by MnSpring on 11/06/17 at 08:48:27

Sun Morning, watched the T.V. News.
Stephanopoulos was throwing soft balls to Brazile.

Watching that, listening to her.
I believe, She, is going to take a run at POTUS.

She knows, her party, has exploded, and she is running around picking up the, (good), pieces.  
Assembling them, and working to rebuild it, tossing out most of the ‘Swampy water’.
     (Well some of it)

She Still,  defended HRC, she still defended the party.
She never mentioned one word about, who, gave HRC debate questions,
    (And of course, Georgey Poridy, Never Asked)
Yet she is  Just, smart enough, to toss HRC under the buss,
        (Just a  tinny tiny bit)
Because she knows what the Voters, (The Legal Ones), want to hear.

That ‘interview’, was just the start of her campaign, which was very cleverly disguised as a, ‘interview’.

If she is on the ticket.
 That  would be  VERY, Scary  Indeed !!!!!!!!

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/06/17 at 08:51:17

You don't think she could possibly win,do you?

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by MnSpring on 11/06/17 at 09:36:24


455A5C5B4641704070485A561D2F0 wrote:
You don't think she could possibly win,do you?


Don’t know.
Think it will depend, on how well she,  LIES,
and how many people, ‘Forget’, what was done.

Title: Re: If Donna Brazile can admit it, maybe you shoul
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/06/17 at 11:01:25

There are so many idiots who get reelected that I guess nothing is impossible, but I really want to believe America is smarter than that.
There is one woman I'd vote for.
In a heartbeat.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.