|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> HW? /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1507414072 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/17 at 15:07:52 |
|
Title: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/17 at 15:07:52 Where is the outrage? I've been waiting. I've known about it for a coupla Days. I've been waiting for you lefties to denounce Another criminal lefty. But Weinstein is not someone you're following. He's not a bub,, so it's not important. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/07/17 at 15:22:32 4E5157504D4A7B4B7B43515D16240 wrote:
They wanted it.......... |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/07/17 at 16:11:14 Maybe it's in the cupboard as your outrage over TM.. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Tim Murphy, a longtime supporter of anti-abortion legislation, resigned he will not seek re-election next year following revelations he had pressured the woman with whom he had an extramarital affair to have an abortion. Weinstien's behaviour was despicable,.. but he's not our President, or elected representative. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/07/17 at 16:48:20 Well their, was a comment, from a, Lefty, Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, LIRE. And, (Oh Gosh), it was on Chicken Noodle News. Where a woman, bringing interviewed, , In the Middle of saying, ’This is wrong, and this and that person, came forward. She HAD, to, ‘Justify’, the behavior, by saying: ‘Well Times have changed, we elected a POTUS, who said he grabs, a woman’s, Private Parts’. So, what’s new? H.W. can Screw Blue, and Tattoo, anyone he wants. And yep, it’s Perfectly OK, (Because he has a, ‘Healthy’, appetite’) So just pay them off, to say nothing. Yet a, POTUS, did some ‘locker’ room talk, and all hell breaks loose. So for any, ‘Progressive, Kum-By-You, singer', on this site, Their will be no comment from them. From, Hollywood; (Just, Justification) Probably: ’Times have changed’, ‘He has a Healthy Appetite’, ’The POTUS did it’. And: ‘Do as I say, not as I do’. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/17 at 17:23:17 Let me Think a minnit... So, some asshat is a hypocrite, Saying he opposes abortion, but when it suddenly became applicable to His life, suddenly he became a believer.. Okay, not cool. Excellent test of ethics is seeing the Cost of believing in something suddenly looks too painful and the moral backbone snaps... Uncool, Weinstein has been preying on women FOR DECADES, illegal, ILLEGAL and morally reprehensible, and Bot tries to make them offsetting penalties! Unsurprising. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/07/17 at 17:57:11 1006110C14010C17630 wrote:
“… but he’s not our President, or elected representative …” Absolutely True. Next questions: When did the POTUS, do such a thing. ? Why, is, H.W., Better than, ‘Murphy’. ? Why is not, ‘Hollywood’, TOTALLY OUTRAGED, over this. Instead of, ‘Justifying’ it. ? (Inquiring Minds, would like to know your POV) |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/07/17 at 18:00:17 3523342931242932460 wrote:
Neither was Trump at the time...... Next outrage please. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/07/17 at 18:31:55 5D4E564B4E58482F0 wrote:
Then, vote Harvey for President next election... He's a more successful businessman and smarter than a 5th grader... and apparently has the same moral character as the man you all love... PS... isn't this getting tired yet?... ...(Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You, singer', Snowflakes)... You complain about my drive-bys... how about yours?... Ms,... I'm basically the only liberal still here, and I'm over your retarded schoolboy rantings. Man up,.. and talk like an adult... You wouldn't say these things to my face or you'd be extricating my boot from your ass, so STFU... Snowflaky enough for you??? |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/07/17 at 18:55:17 “… You wouldn’t say these things to my face or you’d be extricating my boot from your ass, so STFU..." LOL, Oh Yea, I Would !!!!!!!!! And SO, Interesting. that you take the words": "..(Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You, singer', Snowflakes)..." As Personal. Does the Shoe Fit ? |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/17 at 18:56:45 Being cornered and told what you need to DO in order to get your career off the ground.. Think about that. Bonus round Who had the first skyscraper built by a woman? Did TRUMP give a woman and her kids safe haven? Where did trumps accusers run off to after they got challenged? This is not about Trump. It's about a man who PREYS on women. He is able to make their careers or not. But, some people are unable to just accept that someone rich, powerful and very involved in the lives of the Clintons and Obama is a turd. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/07/17 at 19:43:16 Willie was in the office when an old man got his wang sucked, in the F'N Whitehouse, by an 18 year old TEENAGER.... But hey...... She didn't have to get an abortion if she swallowed. Liberal reasoning ::) |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/07/17 at 20:09:44 3A2C3B263E2B263D490 wrote:
Again, Who, Moderates, a, ‘Moderator’. Who said, ” he does NOT, ‘CENSURE’, on a POV, but ONLY, ‘CENSURES, on, “Language”. Hmmmmmmmm Wasn’t their a ‘Post’, somewhere about that? Wasn’t a, ‘Post’ on, ‘Censorship’, ‘Censored’, Raydawg, I Agree: Where you said: “…I guess the run of civility is over here now…” When a, ‘Moderator says’: “… or you’d be extricating my boot from your ass, so STFU…” Seems like POV’s, If NOT, the, Exact Thing, a, ‘Moderator Wants’, The, ‘Rules’, are, ALL the, ‘Moderators’, Rules. Well so Be it. Let the, ‘Moderator’, Rule. !!!!!!!!! (Unless it is a, PUPPET, Saying what he is, ’Told’, to Say) |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/07/17 at 21:01:34 So classy! allegation emerges Late Friday, The Huffington Post published a graphic account from local TV reporter Lauren Sivan. She told reporter Yashar Ali that a decade ago Weinstein cornered her in a restaurant hallway, and after she rejected his attempts to kiss her, he exposed himself to her before proceeding to masturbate without her consent. "Yeah, this happened," tweeted Sivan, linking to the story. "Luckily I didn't need a job or favor from him (plus) didn't have to be polite. Others did. Keep that in mind." A Weinstein rep had no comment when reached by USA TODAY. But, but, but Trump, Trump, |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by pg on 10/08/17 at 05:11:20 They are exposed for the rats they are jumping off a sinking vessel!! Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/17 at 05:31:43 Easy peasy fellas.....this is Tall Table 2.0. Harvey Weinstein did everything leftist believe Trump did, but didn't. It's the usual double standard conservatives face. Did you hear about the gay coffee shop owner who kicked out the Christian group? No, course not. Do you think that coward would have done the same to an Isalmic Fundamentalist group. No, he'd be too afraid to. I don't watch late night "comedic" talk shows or SNL because they are really nothing more that MSNBC anchors with their own shows who are occasionally funny. Not that they ever had any credibility but not torching Weinstein or asking Chelsea when she's a guest the same questions they ask Ivanka pretty much is all you need to know. Pretty soon, a new guy is going to get a show because he's genuinely funny and won't wear the liberal jersey like the others. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by pg on 10/08/17 at 05:35:22 655750414657407F534059320 wrote:
I'm not sure what that means, even the Mods can tell you to F-off now..... Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 06:35:05 4750565A5545370 wrote:
I'm not sure what that means, even the Mods can tell you to F-off now..... Best regards,[/quote] You guys voted for no moderation... If incivility rules, I play with a different deck... You want to go back to being civil?,... I'm more than willing, but I won't take this BS sitting down. Lay of the Mod bashing,.. there has been no Moderation of this forum for many many months,.. and look what you've turned it in to. Lord of the Flies... Consensus seems to be a return to civility?... Okay,.. put away your forks... |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 07:20:23 Hell, it's not a quilting circle.. I think we do okay. Dumbass can't call me a maggot and spell it right, keeps coming back with attempts to piss me off. Fails, Nothing wrong with incivility. There is Enough People who get upset need to calm down. If it takes a day, okay. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/08/17 at 08:06:37 796F78657D68657E0A0 wrote:
This TT Forum is going along Just fine. Interesting, it is the same person, who has told one to, ‘F#@K Off’ and another, ’I’m gonna stick a foot up up your azz’ Again a Old adage; ‘It is not the attack, that is surprising, it is the, reason, for the attack.” I view the comment, “…’turned it in to Lord of the Flies…” As not even close. Not even ‘remotely’ close. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 08:54:34 6C4F725153484F46210 wrote:
I get it now,.. what you want is for the Moderater to be civil,.. but everyone else can say what they want... ::) |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/08/17 at 10:42:02 7563746971646972060 wrote:
I get it now,.. what you want is for the Moderater to be civil,.. but everyone else can say what they want... ::)[/quote] Bot...... I don't believe I fall into the right, or left, as much as you guys. The extreme right scare the crap outta me, they are Nazi like. The extreme left, to me, seems bigger, and has the bigger podium, upon which they spew their intolerance of opposing views and beliefs. I would even venture to say its the left, who spawn many extremist on the right, as they were pushed away from dialogue in the "open" by the constraints of PC doctrine/practice. You show your frustration with cussing, because you think the right on here deserve it..... How does that work to a better understanding of anything? I have said many times, Trump is not the "personality" that people find endearing or even "right", no..... Why do you think none of this stuff seems to matter, regardless of how much CNN and the press, DNC, etc, hammer him? Its because they don't care about Trump, not in the sense of a "normal" occupant of the Whitehouse. This is an uprising against the policies pushed by ALL the political operatives that have driven this division of folks, identity politics, coming back to bite them in their collective azzes. The more the "left" attacks Trump, the more "frustrated" these folks get, revealing how absolute these politician are on destroying a person, rather than fixing our problems..... And the rank of ANTI DC votes will continue to swell. It will catch both party incumbents, you watch. Look at the ones bailing already, and the entrenched ones, worried about reelections. Everyone is frustrated, but calling names and cussing will just not fix a darn thing. Sooner or later we will have to cut out this cancer..... Might as well do it before it grows bigger, which will only mean good flesh will have to die as well, in order to assure the cancerous flesh is totally eradicated. You call Trumps actions cancerous, well then cut out the same flesh actions on the left, no more excuses, period. You either understand that, or suffer accordingly, its your own free will, as is the free will of others, to push you back, and keep the insanity alive, but not well..... |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 13:16:30 Arguing whether Trump is the virus or the disease doesn't change the fact that he is toxic... ...and incompetent... and corrupt... Real Republicans know this just as much as Democrats... Trump's real base is nothing more than embittered white rage... No policy or change in governance will help them. as a program to give out brain cells to the underprivileged is impossible... |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 14:13:11 You supported Obama? I don't remember seeing you condemn destroying Libya and murdering the leader. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 14:18:33 ... didn't condemn him for getting Bin Laden either... JOg, if Alex Jones had told you getting Gaddafi was a good thing you'd go right along with that too... What in the world does that idiot tell you?... Gaddafi was a good guy?... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 15:15:53 You're unbelievable. You think AJ tells me what to think? My radio broke a long time ago. I don't listen to him any more. He Never told me what to think. I have been reaching away from MSM for information for DECADES. I posted links to information about life in Libya. You don't answer questions. Here, try this. We destroyed the World's Largest Irrigation System. Why? I thought we were trying to improve the lives of the Libyan people. Since he was such a bad guy, how did he survive riding through the streets Standing up out of the roof of the c a r? Did you know he gave land to people who wanted to be farmers? Provided health care. Sent people, with a friend, out of the country for medical care if it wasn't available? Was it safe to cross him? Noooo... You need to do your own thinking. You trust the government approved version of the facts. Didn't they lie to us about Vietnam and Iraq? Why are we in Afghanistan? bya under Muammar al-Gaddafi? … https://www.quora.com/What-was-life-like-in-Libya-under-Muammar-al... I hope that someone who was actually there in Gaddafi's Libya ... life like in Libya under Muammar al-Gaddafi? ... Under Gaddafi, there was free high quality ... History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Libya_under_Muammar_Gaddafi History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi. The green flag of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya was the only national flag in the world with just one color. Part of a series on ... Coup d'état of 1969 · Libyan Arab Republic ... · Transition to the ... Ten Reasons Libya Under Gaddafi Was a Great Place to … https://www.africanexponent.com/post/ten-reasons-libya-under... Was Gaddafi a dictator? Yes! However, he also had a heart for his country and the world conveniently skips that part every time. Libya under Gaddafi was not entirely ... Videos of quality of life in libya under gaddafi bing.com/videos ‘Life for most Libyans is worse than it was under Gaddafi’ 3:58 ‘Life for most Libyans is worse than it was under Gaddafi’ RT Gaddafi The Truth About Libya- Documentary 1:00:27 Gaddafi The Truth About Libya- Documentary YouTube What Was Libya Like 20 Years Ago? 9:40HD What Was Libya Like 20 Years Ago? YouTube Libya and Gaddafi - TRUTH NOW! 28:02HD Libya and Gaddafi - TRUTH NOW! YouTube See more videos of quality of life in libya under gaddafi Libyans Under Gaddafi Live A Better Life Than … www.nairaland.com/728459 Sep 26, 2017 · Libyans Under Gaddafi Live A Better Life Than ... hospitals are comparable to high-quality European facilities. Libya ranks No. 53 on the United ... How the life in Libya was under Gaddafi's rule - … lunaticoutpost.com/showthread.php?tid=310273 May 20, 2013 · How the life in Libya was under Gaddafi's rule: 1. There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens. 2. … Debate: Libya was better under Muammar Qaddafi | … www.debate.org/debates/Libya-was-better-under-Muammar-Qaddafi/1 Read the pros and cons of the debate Libya was better under Muammar Qaddafi Was Libya better under the rule of Gaddafi? - Quora https://www.quora.com/Was-Libya-better-under-the-rule-of-Gaddafi Was Libya better under the rule of Gaddafi? ... What was life like in Libya under Muammar al-Gaddafi? For the average Libyan was it better to live under Gaddafi, ... Libyans regret, miss life under Gaddafi | The Sunday Mail www.sundaymail.co.zw/libyans-regret-miss-life-under-gaddafi Five years on from Britain’s ‘ill conceived’ military intervention to dispose of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, ordinary people in Libya say life was better under the ... Quality Of Life: Libya by Omar Banana on Prezi https://prezi.com/zdxejnvqtcsa/quality-of-life-libya Quality Of Life: LIBYA Libya is a country located in Northern Africa, it was founded in 1951. It was ruled by King Idris Senussi for 18 years. In 1969 Muammar Gaddafi ... Related searches for quality of life in libya under gaddafi libya under gaddafi life in libya after gaddafi libyan economy under gaddafi is libya better without gaddafi muammar gaddafi of libya overthrow of gaddafi libya where is gaddafi gaddafi History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi Muammar Gaddafi became the de facto leader of Libya on 1 September 1969 after leading a group o… Wikipedia |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 15:19:42 https://www.bing.com/search?pc=SOWI&form=AMZNS2&q=Gadhaffi+riding+through+streets Some video I've seen had armed men walking around. Our presidents haven't been PHOTOGRAPHED, with Armed military in years. Find out what life in Libya was like. They had it GOOD. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 16:25:20 Fake news... right?... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545819/Uncovered-The-macabre-sex-chamber-Libyas-Colonel-Gaddafi-raped-girls-boys-young-14.html Washington POST- ""Gaddafi, who died in 2011, controlled Libya for four decades, quashing all opposition with a fervent brutality. Buoyed by oil wealth, he had been a major backer of terrorism, including the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 189 Americans. He had been a prototypically cruel and bizarre dictator before Libyans rose up against him in 2011, prompting a civil war that eventually led to his death. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/08/17 at 17:17:01 “…The more the “left" attacks Trump, the more "frustrated" these folks get, revealing how absolute these politician are on destroying a person, rather than fixing our problems…..” Raydawg, hit the Nail on the Head ! This seems to be, a, Exact, description. I have always been to the, ’Right’ of center. And the, “Lefty, Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Stand in the Street Criers’, who think, Chicken Noodle News, (and like), are the sacrosanct source, on the things that are. Have moved me, MORE, ‘Right’. And the statement from, ‘BOT’: “…Trump is the virus or the disease doesn't change the fact that he is toxic... …and incompetent… and corrupt..."* Simply, ‘Fuels the Fire’. “…Real Republicans know this just as much as Democrats…” Describe, ‘Real Republicans’ ? Are they the ones, that want to stuff a bunch of, YOUR, money in, THEIR, Pockets ? Just like the, ‘Real’, Democrats ? (H.R.C., among others comes to mind) “…a program to give out brain cells to the underprivileged is impossible……” So, someone if in a section 8 housing, has, NO HOPE, of EVER, getting Out? (Regardless of how hard they work) ??????? So someone, who is “… underprivileged…” is a simple, wright off, until they can VOTE, for you ? Read the Post, http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1507414072/20#20 # 20, Again ! (The Entire post, Not just, 'the first line') |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 17:25:55 Yep.. That Uprising Was cia operations. Read, think. We Smear the ones who the warmongers want to destroy. We dehumanize them. How else could they get the ignorant masses to agree? Gee, the WMDs Saddam had never showed up either. Bush made a Joke about it. Looking around the podium, nope, not there, not there either. Ohhh well, he was a bad guy.. Answer the questions I asked. That will open the eyes. Explain why we, in an effort to improve the lives of the Libyan people, destroyed the irrigation system that was built and Paid For, not by taxing THEM, but with money from oil. Yeah, pretend I'm ignorant. Why don't you try to understand how things work? ockerbie: Did someone else bomb Pan Am 103? - CNN www.cnn.com/2012/05/22/world/lockerbie-suspects-qa May 22, 2012 · CNN examines why. Abdelbeset Ali ... was not responsible for bringing down the jet over Scotland in 1988, ... Lockerbie relative: I trust Libya more. Replay. France — Former DST Director Yves Bonnet: “Libya NOT ... https://gosint.wordpress.com/.../the-french-dst-yves-bonnet-lockerbie Aug 14, 2016 · ... for example the Lockerbie ... France — Former DST Director Yves Bonnet: “Libya NOT responsible for ... “Libya is NOT responsible for Lockerbie! ... One Year Ago — Former DST Director Yves Bonnet: “Libya NOT ... https://gosint.wordpress.com/2017/08/14/one-year-ago-former-dst... Aug 14, 2017 · In a recorded interview, Bonnet makes a remarkable allegation: he claims that Libya is NOT responsible for Lockerbie. Here is a ‘rough’ translation: Lockerbie bombing: has the truth finally been revealed ... www.theweek.co.uk/world-news/lockerbie-bomber/57663/lockerbie... IRAN, not Libya, was behind the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people, according to a former Iranian intelligence officer. Abolghassem Mesbahi, a defector to ... Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi dies in Tripoli ... www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-18137896 May 20, 2012 · Video embedded · Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi dies at ... has died at his home in Libya. ... had long maintained that he was not responsible for the Lockerbie ... CIA held Syrian militants responsible for Lockerbie bombing www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10532134/CIA... Dec 20, 2013 · The CIA secretly held Syrian militants, rather than Libya, responsible for the Lockerbie bombing, according to newly unearthed . |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 17:26:53 Do you know Why the Iranians took Americans hostage? |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/08/17 at 17:57:59 5F495E435B4E43582C0 wrote:
embittered white rage Real Republicans Yep, everything else is not real, uh, sorta like those polls. Have you ever looked at the demographics of the results? He got more un-white, un-male vote than Mitt. The tide has shifted, you just want to ignore it and say its not real. Why you can't see its a ANTI movement, I don't know..... Perhaps this is a clue: liberal rage... No policy or change in governance will help them. as a program to give out brain cells to the underprivileged is impossible... Duck, quack, pot, black........ ::) |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/08/17 at 17:59:52 7B6D7A677F6A677C080 wrote:
What a interesting, statement from you. Let’s see, you have been dishing the, POTUS, BECAUSE, He, ’Says things, like they are’. Yet, you, keep saying, Over and Over and Over etc, etc, again, and again. ……. He is NOT, “Presidential” ??? Yet, you, a, ‘Moderator’, are, ”””allowed”””, to say things, Which are, (in most peoples views), NOT, Moderator, Like ?????????? Great, You just moved a, ‘WHOLE BUNCH’, of People, Further, to the Right of Center. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/08/17 at 18:04:36 ;D ;D ;D... I don't move more people Right of center... There's nobody here that ain't over the cliff Right already... ;D Quote:
.. and I'm fueling the fire?... ;D Once again,.. you're wanting to spit venom and have me passively take your BS... Sorry Fairy,.. it don't work like that... You want to behave?.. then I'll behave... ...or, do want me to make you?... You should quit poking the bear... I can reinstate civility if I feel it necessary... This "unmoderated" forum was voted for, and I have been abiding by that decision... ..and it has been "bash the Liberal" name calling ever since... Tell you what,... I'll make the first move... I will act with civility in spite of you... Let's see how adult you can be?... |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 18:13:46 I'm so far right I call Bush a war criminal. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/08/17 at 18:56:22 786761667B7C4D7D4D75676B20120 wrote:
Ever notice when driving if you turn right, or for that matter, left, at every intersection, you end up just going in circles? It reminds me of doing the same thing over and over, again, but expecting a different result, is like driving yourself to insanity. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 19:11:20 Your point? |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by raydawg on 10/08/17 at 19:37:32 253A3C3B2621102010283A367D4F0 wrote:
Jog At times I wonder how many crayons you use to color with....... The point is, if you fall into believing it has to be all right, or left, politically, socially, etc..... Do I need to borrow one of your crayons, or do you think you can figger out how to fill in the area between the lines, all by yourself now? |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/08/17 at 19:45:46 I call Bush a war criminal. WTF .. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/09/17 at 09:35:58 4C5A4D50485D504B3F0 wrote:
Let’s do this, in a style, made popular, buy another person, with your beliefs. “…Once again,.. you’re wanting to spit venom and have me passively take your BS…” Don’t understand that. I did Not threaten, to stick my, ‘boot up someones butt’. I did not say, ‘F%#CK YOU’, to someone. “…Sorry Fairy,.. it don’t work like that…" Once again, don’t understand the, ‘Ultra’ Liberal reference? Should you not call me a, Nazi, Hitler, A KKK member ??? “…You want to behave?.. then I'll behave... …or, do want me to make you?…" Well, you have the, ‘choice’, to, Try. “…You should quit poking the bear…” That would depend on, what kind of Bear, and what kind of, Poker. (Would also depend on, who, is the bear, and, who, is the poker) “…I can reinstate civility if I feel it necessary…” That sounds just like: “ If you don’t play by My rules, than I am going to take my ball and go Home” “…This “unmoderated” forum was voted for, and I have been abiding by that decision..." Wasn’t their a recent election, about, a person who should govern this Nation ? “…and it has been “bash the Liberal" name calling ever since..." Would that be like, ‘Orange’, ’Small Hands’, and recently, “…doesn’t change the fact that he is toxic... …and incompetent… and corrupt..." Etc, Etc, Etc, ETC ! “…Tell you what,... I'll make the first move... I will act with civility in spite of you... Let’s see how adult you can be?…” I will tell you, what, I am going to do. It is apparent, you, don’t like my, ‘right’ of center, Politics. And you, don’t like it when I, (and many others), point out, your Left of center, ideas. with Facts, of why they won’t work. So, I will Not comment on any of your Posts on here. (You want to comment on mine, fine. Spew, ‘Your’, hatred of my POV, Use Language like, ‘foot up your Butt’, and ‘F-U’, fine, up to you) I, will, continue to post. I will continue to give my P.O.V Now, the, CHOICE, is yours. Either accept it. Or Kick me off. PICK ONE ! |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/17 at 04:30:48 For your pleasure, as only Mark Steyn can say it. On point as always. When a decent old stiff such as Mitt Romney talks earnestly about looking for suitable female job candidates and clumsily distills the effort into the phrase "binders full of women", all the smart sophisticated types jump on it and make it a punchline for an antiquated condescension that only confirms how irredeemably misogynist the GOP is. By contrast, when Harvey Weinstein corners a TV reporter in the corridor of his restaurant and forces her to watch as he unzips his pants, masturbates, and finally concludes the performance by ejaculating into a pot plant, all you hear, from a couple of larger leaves round the back of the plant, are drenched crickets chirping. Three decades of crickets chirping. "Binders full of women": what an appalling sentiment! "Stand there and shut up while I masturbate in your general direction": well, say what you like but Harvey has always supported, as Meryl Streep noted today, "good and worthy causes" - like the Hillary campaign. Not so long ago, picking up a Golden Globe for her turn as Mrs Thatcher, Meryl was happy to salute Harvey Weinstein as God, notwithstanding that the previous occupant of that position was famously antipathetic to the sin of Onan, with or without attendant shrubbery. Harvey, more modestly, saw himself as the ""f**ing sheriff of this f**king lawless piece-of-s**t town". So, when he pounded the crap out of some journalist on a city sidewalk, a hundred cameras snapped, but, mysteriously, not a single photograph saw the light of day. When a junior reporter at The New York Times noticed that the head of Miramax Italy was a guy who knew nothing about movies but was paid 400 grand a year to procure broads for Weinstein, Matt Damon and (alas) Russell Crowe personally called her to talk her out of pursuing the story (subsequently gutted by an editor). As recently as this weekend's "Saturday Night Live", Lorne Michaels, head honcho of the world's most cobwebbed edgy comedy show, declined to address the Weinstein controversy, presumably in case Harvey was merely temporarily hors de combat and a week or two hence was minded to beat Lorne up, too. Possibly Lorne, Matt and Russell have Harvey's name tattooed on their butts. Dame Judi Dench, who played Queen Victoria in another upscale Oscar-bait Weinstein production, does - and she's happy to lower her knickers and show it to you. Or she was, until Sunday. Maybe, all over town, Hollywood A-listers are frantically booking emergency removals of their Weinstein tramp-stamps. Harvey thought those "good and worthy causes" would come through for him again. In response to the disclosure that he had attempted to force Ashley Judd into joining him in the shower, he announced that "I've decided that I'm going to give the NRA my full attention. I hope Wayne LaPierre will enjoy his retirement party. " Sure, that seems an even longer shot than Wayne would attempt, but why wouldn't it work? Twenty years ago, Time's Nina Burleigh said of Harvey's pal Bill Clinton, "I would be happy to give him a bl**job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs." If the chicks'll swallow that, why wouldn't Ashley Judd be lining up to give him an assisted shower for regulating bump stocks? Happy the land in which a "semi-automatic" means Harvey reflexively dropping his trousers when a comely reporter enters the room. Why do Mitt's binders full of women outrage liberal sensibilities but not Harvey's pot plants full of semen? Well, in the old days, the bourgeoisie expected bourgeois values throughout society. The wealthy and powerful disdained them, but discreetly. Now they disdain them openly. Indeed, they wage war on them, relentlessly. Instead, they enforce "progressive" values. Institutions fundamental to the nation-state, such as citizenship, have to be rendered meaningless - so that what matters in any immigration debate is not the citizens but the invaders, to the point where Nancy Pelosi thanks the parents of "Dreamers" for breaking American law and bringing them here, as a precious gift to a nation crying out for even more low-skilled immigrants. As for institutions that pre-date the nation-state - institutions almost as old as humanity - they're as easy to redefine, so that marriage can no longer be confined to those of opposite sexes. Speaking of the sexes, human biology can be vaporized, so that two sexes become 57 genders, and grade-school boys more interested in Barbie than GI Joe get to be pumped full of puberty blockers and directed to the girls' bathroom. And after all that, religion has to be put on the back foot, so that any recalcitrant mom'n'pop bakery for whom two men atop a wedding cake is an abomination, must be hunted down, dragged into court and financially ruined pour encourager les autres. And in a revolutionary present it is necessary ultimately to throttle the past - eliminating Robert E Lee, Christopher Columbus, Dr Seuss, Stephen Foster, the national anthem, to dam up the stream of history, the flow of past to present to future, and thus sever the citizenry from their entire inheritance, so that we are mere flotsam and jetsam on the frothing surface of the moment - a world where, in a certain sense, Harvey Weinstein is God. What's left? The military? Sports? The boy scouts? Traditionally masculine institutions are now among the most cowed and craven and politically correct - far more so than, say, a Weinstein junket to the Cannes Film Festival. Country music? Hey, if that's your bag, don't come crying to CBS vice-presidents when your yee-haw hoedown gets shot up - because "country music fans often are Republican gun toters". So you got what was coming. (In fact, the 58 dead in Las Vegas were overwhelmingly from "blue" states plus a couple of Canadian provinces; over half were from California. But so what? As that network veep sees it, that's what you get for going country when country isn't cool.) The contempt is not always that explicit, but it's ever present. Increasingly in America all the real divisions seem less like political differences - left/right, progressive/conservative, big government/small government - and more like class indicators: Those Who Matter vs Not Our Kind Of People. Poor Hispanics give Nancy Pelosi a warm fluffy sense of her own virtue and moral superiority (as long as they keep their distance, and we ramp up security next time those Dreamers try to rush the stage), whereas poor whites are just a bunch of yahoos. A touch of #BlackLivesMatter in an awards-show dance routine is edgy and radical (as long as the actual BLM types are on the far horizon torching some other guy's neighborhood), whereas upcountry losers ODing on oxycontin and heroin is hicky and depressing. Transgender bathrooms is a modish boutique issue with an appealing exotic frisson, whereas Christian florists ...whoa, who the hell would trust evangelicals with your centerpiece anyway? What's up with that? Those on the receiving end discern this contempt - even without careless Tweeters making it explicit and rejoicing in dead country-music fans. Indeed, the palpable, remorseless condescension of the elites was as responsible for Donald Trump's victory as anything else. And, on the evidence of the last eleven months, it's likely to be equally responsible for his 2020 victory. But they can't help it - because, again, it's a class thing: Trump is rich, but insufficiently refined for Meryl et al. Amid the condescension, there are contradictions. So a century-old statue of someone dead a hundred and fifty years who does not conform to the identity-group pieties of 2017 must be torn down - whereas an actual flesh-and-blood human being who does not conform to the identity-group pieties of 2017 can stagger around Hollywood and New York and London and Rome treating women like garbage. And, more specifically, I see from this week's Multiplex releases that Hollywood is so exquisitely sensitive that, when it options a novel called The Chinaman, it feels obliged to change it to the far more insipid The Foreigner, lest any, er, man from China take offense at the word "Chinaman". Is that a Weinstein movie? Did he modify the title? "Geez, we can't call it The Chinaman, are you crazy? Gimme a minute, I'll think of something - I'm just finishing up with a Chinabroad from the Shanghai accounts department..." Once upon a time, the elites chafed under middle-class morality, and found sly workarounds for their darker appetites. Then came liberation. And in the ruins of bourgeois society a new moral hierarchy arose: Dreamers trump citizens, sexual identity trumps religious faith, female empowerment trumps the manly virtues... And yet, as the case of Harvey Weinstein suggests, in the end nothing much has changed: As the old elite declined to be constrained by middle-class morality, the new elite decline to be constrained by their own purported morality. In the end, it's still about who has power, and who is disposable. As Lee Smith points out, the truth about Weinstein is only in the papers because Hillary lost. Were President Rodham in the Oval Office, this story could not run - because the First Gentleman has done everything and more that their longtime donor has done. But then Hillary's very candidacy makes the same point as Harvey's drenched pot plant - for, if Democrats believed their own pap about "glass ceilings", they would have found an Angela Merkel or Helle Thorning-Schmidt or Theresa May or Julia Gillard or Helen Clark or Portia Simpson-Miller, rather than nominating not merely the wife of a former president (which is pure banana republic) but the creepy enabler of the most sociopathic exerciser of droit du seigneur in the modern era (which is even more pathetic). And, as the cherry on top, they saddled her with a slogan that sounds like a pledge of solidarity with sexual-assault victims - "I'm With Her" - but is, in fact, the precise opposite: I'm with Hillary, and Hillary's with Meryl, and Meryl's with Harvey, and Harvey's with that gal from the TV station in the corridor to the kitchen, but once he's zipped up and returned to the fundraiser, he'll be with Hillary, too. As a female-empowerment story, the Clinton candidacy was a joke. All Harvey Weinstein has done is provide an ugly but apt punchline. Rim shot - straight into the pot plant. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/10/17 at 09:19:20 Amid the condescension, there are contradictions. So a century-old statue of someone dead a hundred and fifty years who does not conform to the identity-group pieties of 2017 must be torn down - whereas an actual flesh-and-blood human being who does not conform to the identity-group pieties of 2017 can stagger around Hollywood and New York and London and Rome treating women like garbage. Watching lefties whistle past the graveyard on this is so much Fun! They act like they actually expect to be treated as if their position has merit and they have the moral high ground.. And they act as if we're too stupid to see through the crap. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/17 at 12:58:53 They've been burned on several election cycles in a row, not just Trump's victory. You think they'd learn by now. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by Serowbot on 10/10/17 at 13:04:40 Let's tear down all those Harvey Weinstein statues too!... ;D |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/17 at 13:19:27 Yea, this has been on the news and all, but imagine if this had been one of the Koch brothers..... Not only would little Georgie Clooney be calling for contributions to be returned, he'd be demanding candidates who won using that tainted money, resign. SNL would have nonstop skits, the late night 'comedians' would be tearing up..... By the way, I read the New Yorkers story on HW. Holy $hit! Talk about grabbin' 'em... I would have thought Hollywood defending Polanski and Woody Allen was descending to a level of hell that was probably the basement, but I guess not. All these scums knew about this guy. Still, some of the biggest names yacked about the fabricated Trump acts as if they had to cover their ears, the stores were to awful for their delicate senses. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/10/17 at 13:30:48 Hell froze over. I heard some lefty woman, a WOMAN , blame the way women dress. I thought protecting Bill was strange. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by WebsterMark on 10/10/17 at 14:06:37 Here's the info. Apparently this woman didn't get the email that HW is officially thrown off the train. However as the last comment notes, she must have gotten the email the next morning and is singing out of the same approved hymnal. =Donna Karan, 69, defended Harvey Weinstein, 65, during a red carpet interview at the CinéFashion Film Awards on Sunday =She told a reporter 'we have to look at ourselves' and question how women are presenting themselves and their sexuality =The fashion designer's comments come after many Hollywood stars denounced the film producer after he was accused of sexually harassing multiple women =When asked if whether Hollywood has been 'busted', she replied with a smile saying Weinstein isn't solely to blame =Rose McGowan, one of Weinstein's alleged victims, called Karan 'deplorable' and said 'aiding and abetting' the producer 'is a crime' =In a statement released early Tuesday morning, Karan said her comments were 'out of context' and apologized to 'anyone I offended' and victims of abuse |
|
Title: Re: HW? I Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/10/17 at 15:58:27 That's the one! I heard part of that. Absolutely Gobsmacked!! I can't Believe she said that. The lefties otta be all over her. Imagine if Trump had suggested a rape victim Had it coming Because she was asking for it Because her dress was short and she was pretty.. |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by pg on 10/12/17 at 07:35:54 “I’m not doing okay, but I’m trying. I gotta get help.” He added, “We all make mistakes. Second chance, I hope.” How can this SOB still be on the street? He should be under the jail by now. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: HW? Post by MnSpring on 10/12/17 at 16:59:12 7067616D6272000 wrote:
I would say, rather simple. The, 'Limousine Liberals', receive money from him, so they are, NOT, going to eat the, 'Golden', Goose. And the, Media? Same Thing !!!!!! |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |