|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Inauguration /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1484871389 Message started by MnSpring on 01/19/17 at 16:16:29 |
|
Title: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/19/17 at 16:16:29 Inauguration The Oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” Will be watching tomorrow at 1 PM, (Noon in DC) (Cleared my calendar for that time) Very interested to see, how long it takes, for the New POTUS, to pen, a retraction, on the totally ILLEGAL, Freedom Steeling, Constitutional End Runs, the former, POTUS did. (Presidential Executive Orders) On further looking found: (on Inauguration balls) Dwight D. Eisenhower: 2 John F. Kennedy: 5 Bill Clinton: 14 George W. Bush: 8 Barack Obama: 10 Media says; 2, some say 3, for Trump Even if 3, a Heck of a Lot more of, TAXPAYER, money spent on 14. Looking forward to Tomorrow ! |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/19/17 at 16:20:11 Reading the oath I can help but think that no president that I can remember has broken this oath more than the outgoing POTUS. I to look forward to tomorrows transition |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by old.indian on 01/19/17 at 17:18:20 Haven't been so entertained since I can't remember when by the antics of the mainstream media and the wanttobes, neverweres, and has-beens acting as if someone actually cares about their opinions. The pollsters crying that Trump is going into office with "record low popularity numbers". (As if they had any creditability after stating that Hillary and the Democrat Party would sweep into the white house and a strong majority in both houses of congress November 8th.... :-[) The D list "celebrities" loudly announcing their intention to "boycott" the inauguration. (As if they would be missed.. ::).) The "women's march" to protest the incoming administration being "sexist". (Where were these same women's groups when Bill Clinton was flaunting his affairs before, during, and after his time in the White House ????? :-/) I understand that a large number of bikers are attending the inauguration to act as security. :) Snowflakes vs. grumpy, non-PC bikers.... Be worth the price of admission to observe ....... (I have fond memories of a Manhattan "peace march" in the early '70s that annoyed a group of construction workers..... ;D) |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by pg on 01/19/17 at 17:20:45 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z03dlN2BDlA[/media] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z03dlN2BDlA Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/19/17 at 17:40:34 “women's march" to protest the incoming administration being "sexist" Have you read, learned, that the, “women’s march”, has BANNED, Any, women, who is known to believe in, ‘Pro-Life’ ??????? Yep, the “women’s march”, org, has, BANNED THEM !!!!! Gee, what would happen, if someone, ‘Banned’, someone on renting a house, Biassed on their, race, creed, religion, believes, Rather then their ability to, pay, for the rent? What would Happen ??????? (As to, snoop dawg, I don't believe, their are many people with substance, that Gives a da mm what he says) |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/19/17 at 17:44:59 Wait, Their, ARE, people that care, about what, ’snoop dawg’ says. Those are, people, who are, ‘affected’, by what he says, because 97% of them have the same skin color. And I surmise, they are ‘Greatly’, Offended by his words ! |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/19/17 at 18:42:46 52515913545359545C533D0 wrote:
I to am eagerly looking forward to the snowflake vs anti pc biker clash. I hope someone trains a camera on that tomorrow |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/20/17 at 07:50:00 I wonder how many schools are having assemblies today to watch the inauguration. I know everyone of them did 8 years ago |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by raydawg on 01/20/17 at 09:38:08 I have read some have forbidden it..... No turning back folks. The truth often hurts, and is ugly. The civil war proved that, in a sense, we are still fighting the same mindset >:( |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Papa Bear on 01/20/17 at 10:29:51 I'm hoping Trump forces Colbert to eat crow ... ;) |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 11:00:31 Quite the crowd in the National Mall.... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by raydawg on 01/20/17 at 11:55:27 I still do not believe it's about the man, no.... He is an oddity at best. I believe it's the movement, of rejecting the old system and its standard bearers! |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 13:34:10 President Donald J. Trump leads a standing ovation for Hillary Clinton & former President Bill Clinton: "I have a tremendous amount of respect for these two people." So did he mean all the things he said in the campaign? Was he lying? Is this all just a game? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/20/17 at 13:40:45 Tough to even hazard a guess.. I'm hoping he was just being polite,, |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by oldNslow on 01/20/17 at 14:01:27 594748494459425F2D0 wrote:
JOG wrote: Quote:
Trump played football and baseball in high school. His coaches probably taught him to say nice things about, and to, the team he just beat ( even if he didn't really mean it.) ;) |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/20/17 at 14:22:45 322C23222F322934460 wrote:
So its official, there is absolutely nothing he could say that you wouldn't have a prob with. I think u just like to complain |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by verslagen1 on 01/20/17 at 14:32:46 He needed to walk over and hand her a participation trophy inscribed with 2nd best presidential nominee. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/20/17 at 15:03:52 “January 20th, 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again." - Donald Trump |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by WebsterMark on 01/20/17 at 15:31:22 342730312E2325272C73420 wrote:
3rd, if it wasn't for the super delegates...... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by pg on 01/20/17 at 17:10:30 http://nypost.com/2017/01/20/this-trump-protester-completely-lost-her-mind/amp/ Click on this and watch the 30 second clip, you can't make this up! ;D Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 17:19:43 7947464A5844452B0 wrote:
JOG wrote: Quote:
Trump played football and baseball in high school. His coaches probably taught him to say nice things about, and to, the team he just beat ( even if he didn't really mean it.) ;) [/quote] So is he going to lock hillary up? The chants at his rallies were undeniable. I guess I just don't understand - to me, this seems to be a lie. To show someone no respect in one breath and then deep respect in the other. This isn't football, this is public office. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 17:22:12 5C797364262F2324160 wrote:
So its official, there is absolutely nothing he could say that you wouldn't have a prob with. I think u just like to complain[/quote] Um, not at all - in fact, it's the exact opposite. I would like to see him follow through. Like he told the people at his rallies - "throw them out". If he's such a man of his word - why wouldn't he at least shun them? Why be nice? Is he going to "lock her up"? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by WebsterMark on 01/20/17 at 17:30:42 I thought you were gonna get "Lost"? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 17:40:38 0B393E2F28392E113D2E375C0 wrote:
Naw - you'd all miss me too much. But I won't be as "active" on this forum. Well, at least not until president trump gets impeached... LOL So no need to worry about me - what about the president being so respectful to hillary? Do you think he should be? Should he "lock her up"? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/20/17 at 17:54:07 lock her up"? He should try.. she's guilty.. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by oldNslow on 01/20/17 at 17:57:58 150B040508150E13610 wrote:
JOG wrote: Quote:
Trump played football and baseball in high school. His coaches probably taught him to say nice things about, and to, the team he just beat ( even if he didn't really mean it.) ;) [/quote] So is he going to lock hillary up? The chants at his rallies were undeniable. I guess I just don't understand - to me, this seems to be a lie. To show someone no respect in one breath and then deep respect in the other. This isn't football, this is public office.[/quote] Not football, but politics is still a game. I think what he's saying to the Clintons is this: "I won. You lost" I can pretend to be nice to you now 'cause it doesn't matter any more, 'cause you aint sh*t. I'm pretty sure that they understood. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 18:03:35 407E7F73617D7C120 wrote:
JOG wrote: Quote:
Trump played football and baseball in high school. His coaches probably taught him to say nice things about, and to, the team he just beat ( even if he didn't really mean it.) ;) [/quote] So is he going to lock hillary up? The chants at his rallies were undeniable. I guess I just don't understand - to me, this seems to be a lie. To show someone no respect in one breath and then deep respect in the other. This isn't football, this is public office.[/quote] Not football, but politics is still a game. I think what he's saying to the Clintons is this: "I won. You lost" I can pretend to be nice to you now 'cause it doesn't matter any more, 'cause you aint sh*t. I'm pretty sure that they understood. [/quote] Perhaps, but trump's followers won't. (look at JOG's post). They don't think it's a game. I don't either. This is the country we're talking about, not a football team. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by pg on 01/20/17 at 18:10:01 2F313E3F322F34295B0 wrote:
Chaffetz isn't done with her yet and I'm absolutely certain Sessions is up for the task. Time will tell..... Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/20/17 at 18:15:15 Trumps FOLLOWERS? I existed and stood for what I believe long before Trump showed up. In fact, he's not even a real conservative or libertarian.. I want her in jail, because of what she did, not because she is a democrat. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 18:16:04 293E38343B2B590 wrote:
Chaffetz isn't done with her yet and I'm absolutely certain Sessions is up for the task. Time will tell..... Best regards,[/quote] Funny - sessions recused himself and chaffie only said "it continues" - so... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/20/17 at 18:22:07 3B242225383F0E3E0E36242863510 wrote:
The problem is then - she's been found not guilty. She's either the criminal mastermind of the century, or the republicans leading these investigations are complete morons... How many panels/investigations found her guilty? I'm not defending her careless actions, but seriously - 9 separate benghazi hearings?? How long did she sit in front of the email investigators? Like 10 hours? No guilt... Oh well, now we have four more years to "trump" up some charges I suppose - I guess we'll see. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by oldNslow on 01/20/17 at 18:41:25 Quote:
We will see, I suppose. I think it would be a mistake to underestimate Trump's follower's ability to understand perfectly well what he did, and why he did it though. The Clintons will slink back to Chappaqua, Hillary will take walks in the woods and take selfies with dipsh*ts, and by Monday nobody will remember a thing about the luncheon. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/20/17 at 21:22:55 Anyone who has read what Comey said and read some of the emails, it's obvious she is guilty. Comey Said it. Go read what he said. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by raydawg on 01/20/17 at 22:28:44 Well my take thus far is a lot of liberal pundits appear unhinged.... Some folks seem to think their views and beliefs as gospel, and they take this as a personal rejection..... Talk about an inferiority complex on top of being egoistical sumbeech, to boot, goodness. The protesters seemed a dud, as to what was forecasted, I guess Soro's wasn't paying as well now that his gravy train is drying up ;D But too, I believe I am seeing some libs coming to grips with reality. I think they too see how stupid some of these demonstrations are, and want no part of that insanity.... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by pg on 01/21/17 at 04:32:11 425C53525F425944360 wrote:
Chaffetz isn't done with her yet and I'm absolutely certain Sessions is up for the task. Time will tell..... Best regards,[/quote] Funny - sessions recused himself and chaffie only said "it continues" - so...[/quote] Sessions didn't say he would not defer it to the Dep AG.... Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by WebsterMark on 01/21/17 at 05:24:59 Jog is right, of course she's guilty, but let's keep something in mind, Trump can't just lock anyone up, he can't even indict anyone. My guess is if she shuts up and fades away, this gets dropped. If she yaps and tries to remain an active player, it will never go away. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/21/17 at 05:38:03 467473626574635C70637A110 wrote:
Also, right now he is trying to unify the government and indicting her, as much as I would love it, would drive the democrats even further away then they already are. It the attorney general indicted her trump could cure cancer and end world hunger and the democrats would still fight him tooth and nail |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Papa Bear on 01/21/17 at 05:39:40 36253D20253323440 wrote:
THIS ! |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Papa Bear on 01/21/17 at 05:41:59 283639383528332E5C0 wrote:
Yes, it is. Trump "out-Clintoned the Clintons" (The Art of the Deal) [smiley=beer.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Papa Bear on 01/21/17 at 05:46:20 486D6770323B3730020 wrote:
That's party politics at it's best ..... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Papa Bear on 01/21/17 at 05:51:36 Kevin O'Leary (our Canadian version of Trump - Dragon's Den, Shark Tank) recently threw his hat in the ring for Conservative Party leader. I don't believe he has ever held office. I would love it if he ran as an Independent. He will probably be an Independent in Conservative clothing (as Trump is in Republican clothing) |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/21/17 at 06:44:35 So watched some of it yesterday. Gives me a lot of hope. But, I see the ‘Talking Heads’, on the News stations, haven’t learned, just became more, ‘subtle’. News: The Pres, said/did this. (A Yea, we can see that) So it is confirmed. Opinion: the Pres, is thinking this, and doing that, that way because… News: “Their are rioters, just 6 blocks over” (A Yea, again we can see that) Opinion: “Those people are rioting because they believe this and that” But did NOT, talk to them. Guess the talking Heads, are a magic mind reader, because they did not interview any of them, yet were able to say exactly what they were thinking. Then we have the, reg scheduled, news, where the stories were running 3-1 in favor of the protesters. And when a reporter got close enough, (to the peaceful ones), to do a interview. When it was over, the talking heads, Still told you ‘WHAT’ they 'want' you to believe, they said. (Which was different than, when they interviewed the peaceful ones) So, regardless of what happens. I guess, some people, just want to ‘complain’. And take the, ‘other’ side, Just because it is the, ‘Other’ side. Not because of their own, beliefs. Like ALL, those people that said, “I’m Leaving” (But did not) Guess, they were brought up to say anything they want, and never worry, if they don’t ‘do’, because they think everyone else, is just as gutless, and shallow as they are. Has, ANYONE, left for Canada, Yet? Time to sit back, (and from all indications so far), watch this Country grow again. And remember, ‘…will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again." |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/21/17 at 07:25:43 796E68646B7B090 wrote:
Chaffetz isn't done with her yet and I'm absolutely certain Sessions is up for the task. Time will tell..... Best regards,[/quote] Funny - sessions recused himself and chaffie only said "it continues" - so...[/quote] Sessions didn't say he would not defer it to the Dep AG.... Best regards, [/quote] LOL - yeah, but that's not what you said, is it? Nice use of a double negative too... grasping at straws much? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/21/17 at 07:34:53 64414B5C1E171B1C2E0 wrote:
Also, right now he is trying to unify the government and indicting her, as much as I would love it, would drive the democrats even further away then they already are. It the attorney general indicted her trump could cure cancer and end world hunger and the democrats would still fight him tooth and nail[/quote] OK... guilty of what? Why has she never been indited? Why have there been no charges brought up? Is she that much of a master criminal, or are the republicans going after her that dumb? Seriously, I don't have any sympathy for the woman - but all I see and hear is rumor and conspiracy theories - no facts. Rhetoric and rumor, combined with a hate of liberals has been the only "evidence" that I can see. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by T And T Garage on 01/21/17 at 07:41:30 6A757374696E5F6F5F67757932000 wrote:
OK then, if it's so obvious, why no charges? That's not snark, that a legitimate question. Are the prosecutors that inept? Is she that great a mastermind criminal? |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Serowbot on 01/21/17 at 07:49:33 Newsflash,.. Trump is President.. not King... Presidents don't have the power to indict... Trump has promised many things that a king might do... but, no President has that power. Welcome to reality.... |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by WebsterMark on 01/21/17 at 08:12:30 OK then, if it's so obvious, why no charges? That's not snark, that a legitimate question. Are the prosecutors that inept? Is she that great a mastermind criminal? The DOJ indicts, the FBI recommends. The DOJ is political, always is. In Obama's case, it was exceptionally political so no way an indictment was going to happen under Lynch. The question now is, what does it benefit Trump or the nation for that matter, to pursue? On one hand you can say justice should always be pursued but we all know that's bull$hit. I don't think it benefits anyone except hyper partisans and the families of the families of the 3 dead men who died defending Ambassador Stevens. The only benefit to the nation is it forever removes Hilary from any thoughts of future involvement in public life. Think about this; I'm 55 years old. For the vast majority of my adult life, the political world has been dominated by two families, Bush and Clinton. That's over now. Let the dead bury their dead and leave us be. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by WebsterMark on 01/21/17 at 08:13:37 4C5A4D50485D504B3F0 wrote:
...and Hopey-Change never had the power to quiet the seas and cool the earth or whatever total BS line he threw out that made liberals wet. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/21/17 at 08:14:14 I'm supposed to be able to explain WHY? When Comey EXPLAINS where she lied, where they are able to prove she lied, THEN suggest no reasonable prosecutor would go forward? Im supposed to explain what defies Logic? No bot, nobody said Trump, indict. But telling a prosecutor You study this..and if you see wrongdoing, we move on it. And wrongdoing is admitted by Comey. Go Listen READ the WORDS. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by raydawg on 01/21/17 at 08:35:50 7E687F627A6F62790D0 wrote:
Please, tell me of the last 8 years of reality ;D |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by MnSpring on 01/21/17 at 11:13:49 The reports, on the news and the web. Said, ’Stands’ were Empty. Then, Made up, what ever reason they wanted to ‘make-up’, about why. ONE, reporter said: “ are empty because luncheon ran long and buses couldn’t get here in time.” and: “Protesters and heavy security in the city may have kept supporters off the parade route as well." Now, for the, ‘Rest of the Story”. (Paul Harvey) Which was NOT, reported by the Media, (who haven’t learned yet). Luncheon ran overtime, Parade started Late. AND, the VIP’s, (Those stands were reserved for) Could NOT, get their in time. BECAUSE, the VIOLENT, Protesters Started FIRES, And MANY more streets had to be blocked off, so the buses bringing them, could not get their in time. As to: “turnout was (not) anything close to the parade for President Obama in 2009. Oh, could that be, because it was a, WORK DAY ? (And their, are, people that Actually Work, for a living, so they can Pay Taxes !) And No one paid for a, FREE BUSS, Free Tickets, Free Food, a Free Place to stay ? Could , ’that’ be it !!!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by raydawg on 01/21/17 at 12:01:11 11320F2C2E35323B5C0 wrote:
Maybe, maybe not..... Obama's election is, and will always be, historical. Given that, it was a GREAT achievement to a nation that started out with "one party rule" ( white male landowners ). However, tho we can never undo the ugly scars of racism, it was an attempt. Of course it would fail. But I don't think anyone ever imagined his election would lead to greater racial unrest, anger, and division. I don't think he envisioned that either, but along the way folks with more ulterior motive got a hold of him, and we are witnessing the results. Its not about Black, never was, evidenced by Black conservative like Clarence Thomas, etc.... Its not about women, as evidenced by dismissing pro life women to march.... This ideology is about something else, and these two "issues/movements" are just tools, to get there. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by Joer0952 on 01/21/17 at 12:07:09 6E707F7E736E75681A0 wrote:
Also, right now he is trying to unify the government and indicting her, as much as I would love it, would drive the democrats even further away then they already are. It the attorney general indicted her trump could cure cancer and end world hunger and the democrats would still fight him tooth and nail[/quote] OK... guilty of what? Why has she never been indited? Why have there been no charges brought up? Is she that much of a master criminal, or are the republicans going after her that dumb? Seriously, I don't have any sympathy for the woman - but all I see and hear is rumor and conspiracy theories - no facts. Rhetoric and rumor, combined with a hate of liberals has been the only "evidence" that I can see.[/quote] what are you talking about Comey said she deleted emails after they were subpoenaed, and there are may aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings thats called perjury. If her name wasn't Clinton she would have been charged. |
|
Title: Re: Inauguration Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/21/17 at 12:23:51 Tired of having to drag people face first to the obvious. http://lidblog.com/comey-video-hillary-was-reckless-lied-prosecution-not-recommendation/ D O NOT come back saying crap that I can counter with what is in the linked information if you plan on being taken seriously. The Law doesn't care about Intent.. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |