SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Less is more?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1480866253

Message started by raydawg on 12/04/16 at 07:44:13

Title: Less is more?
Post by raydawg on 12/04/16 at 07:44:13

Not on this person(s) level of knowledge of the industry, but I sure fair from it.

Seems to offer up some insightful ideas, and backs them up with possibilities.

You wanna take a stab at it, yea or ney?

http://www.politico.com/sponsor-content/2016/11/if-washington-wants-to-boost-jobs-growth-do-this-first?cid=201611hp

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by thumperclone on 12/04/16 at 08:40:01

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by raydawg on 12/04/16 at 09:29:34

776B766E736671606F6C6D66030 wrote:

ill take a stab with my rusty blade
two examples
did Regans' deregulation of banking help look what it lead to
should the covair or the pinto still be in production both death traps

some regs are helpful others not so much

Oh I agree, but re: product, we have the not so fair tort lawsuits where the attorneys score big time, the plaintiffs pennies on the dollar, and the producer of the faulty/injury product pretty much absolved from further litigation.

This has been a political football as well, and seems the same old parties win, the folks, lose.

Re: banking, you want to elaborate some more w/ Reagan's policies leading to the problem you refer?

Let me give you an example.

Welfare entitlements are meant to be assisting those in need, a good thing, I believe we can all agree to that, yes?
But a way of life, leading to a generational mindset that removes people from stepping up to the responsibility of life and earning their keep.....
Not so good.

That is what I am hoping you can direct me with as to how deregulation is the cause, or effect, or?

Thanks buddy!

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by thumperclone on 12/04/16 at 10:54:40

the s&l crisis cost us taxpayers $130 billion

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by raydawg on 12/04/16 at 11:32:48

1408150D100512030C0F0E05600 wrote:

the s&l crisis cost us taxpayers $130 billion

Yes, but do you contribute that to Reagan, or were there other mitigating circumstances?

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by thumperclone on 12/04/16 at 12:46:46

regans actions opened the door for the greedy

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by raydawg on 12/04/16 at 13:56:23

1408150D100512030C0F0E05600 wrote:

regans actions opened the door for the greedy

What, 16 years later?

Did he say they had to bundle loans?
No.
All of this came as they tried to regulate it again with requirements, etc.

Using the original domino that fell to knock over all the others, then I guess I could extend that type of reasoning to abortion and murder....

If its only a matter of convenience, the bar that needs to be met to stop a beating heart, then I know some who, if their heart was made to stop, would make my life more convenient ;D

Until we quit "one blame fits all" and tackle problems and issues on merit, then we have no right to expect repair....

How do you feel about the original article?

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 12/04/16 at 23:01:07

o the Chevy Corvair. ... national magazine, The Nation, Ralph Nader charged that the 1960-63 Corvairs had ... the Corvair, few if any know that his charges were false and were proven wrong.

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by thumperclone on 12/04/16 at 23:47:58

How do you feel about the original article?

[/quote]

it is airline biased
understandable for the part of the country you live

yes jog the ntsb did disprove nader

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by Paraquat on 12/05/16 at 06:10:21

There's nothing on that list I disagree with, whether the article is biased towards airlines or not. I'd rather see a time stamp on laws. Not necessarily a sunset, but revisit them.

At work, I'm a member of our quality clinic. We address heavy hitting issues and come up with corrective actions. We need to review the actions in 6 months or the next time we run the job to see if we made any improvement. Occasionally, with technological advancements, it becomes beneficial to change the process entirely.

This all seems like common sense, to me. Otherwise you have outdated laws. Like in Alaska. Owners of flamingos may not let their pet into barber shops. Obviously relevant.

--Steve

Title: Re: Less is more?
Post by MnSpring on 12/05/16 at 11:12:37

4071627161657164100 wrote:

" ... We need to review the actions in 6 months or the next time we run the job ..."

It IS, "common sense".
But it seems, lately, that is not a Job Requirement.
Especially in a Government Job !

But then, it could be to costly.
Probably, more people would need to be hired.
A group, who answer to a Secretary, who is someone else’s assistant Secretary, who is the Assistant to two more Secretaries, who have a assistant Secretary each. And All to busy, because they are playing, ‘pokey man’, at their work computer.

Their, still is, a LAW, On the Books, for the Downtown area in Mpls, which says:
“All Business Must, have a Hitching Post, outside their store”.
Just thinking, that, like 100’s of thousands, of others,
could just be ‘removed’.