SuzukiSavage.com /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> VP   Debate /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1475717507 Message started by MnSpring on 10/05/16 at 18:31:47

Title: VP   Debate Post by MnSpring on 10/05/16 at 18:31:47 Interesting. I Think, Pence,   Kicked the, ‘Joker’s’,   (er, Kaine’s),  BUTT  !!!!! EVEN,  CNN,  (Chicken Noodle News) Said:   “With a CNN poll showing a Pence victory”

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by LostArtist on 10/05/16 at 22:13:17 and yet: "PolitiFact has looked at 39 of Kaine’s claims on the Truth-O-Meter. 77 percent of them were ranked as either True, Mostly True, or Half-True. We’ve also looked at 26 of Pence’s statements. 58 percent  were ranked as True, Mostly True, or Half-True. Neither candidate has had any claims ranked as Pants on Fire". http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/oct/03/fact-checking-vice-presidential-debate-kaine-pence/ liars are liars

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by WebsterMark on 10/06/16 at 04:52:40 anyone using the phrase "fact checker" should be slapped.

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by raydawg on 10/06/16 at 05:06:33 Well, what I found interesting is that neither answered her first question, in context. The forum/debate was, should, have been what would they do if the had to exucute the role of becoming president if needed. It quickly turned to jumping in the top of each ticket. Am I to understand then, that they see their role as continuing on all the beliefs, policies, agenda(s) exactly as the one they replaced, or can they be original and distinct in their own administration, if need be. I don't ever wish to be a proverbial rubber stamp to anybody, or anything, never. That would be akin to wearing the same speedo everyday, arg!  ::)

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by LostArtist on 10/06/16 at 16:32:15 5A686F7E79687F406C7F660D0 wrote: anyone using the phrase "fact checker" should be slapped. yeah we should just take politicians at their word....   wait, what???

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by Serowbot on 10/06/16 at 16:47:02 02213D3A0F3C3A273D3A4E0 wrote: yeah we should just take politicians at their word....   wait, what???   Would Trump ever lie?.... ;D ;D ;D https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/03/22/all-of-donald-trumps-four-pinocchio-ratings-in-one-place/

Title: Re: VP   Debate Post by LostArtist on 10/06/16 at 16:54:36 687B637E7B6D7D1A0 wrote: Well, what I found interesting is that neither answered her first question, in context. The forum/debate was, should, have been what would they do if the had to exucute the role of becoming president if needed. It quickly turned to jumping in the top of each ticket. Am I to understand then, that they see their role as continuing on all the beliefs, policies, agenda(s) exactly as the one they replaced, or can they be original and distinct in their own administration, if need be. I don't ever wish to be a proverbial rubber stamp to anybody, or anything, never. That would be akin to wearing the same speedo everyday, arg!  ::) you actually want a politician to answer a question??  like directly??   no, no, no, see, first, you have to make that question a talking point, then maybe, maybe the other side will address it, then, maybe a pundit will get sick of hearing about it and complain about it for 4 more days than anyone asked for, then maybe, maybe, if you are lucky and the wind is blowing at 4 knots over a grasshoppers left knee then that grasshopper will kick and that wind will eventually blow up the candidate's nose and he'll sneeze out the truth.   I've noticed that Pence is really quite skilled at not answering questions and redirecting them.  not that Hillary is bad at that either

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.