|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Reoccurring Phenomena /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1458592886 Message started by pg on 03/21/16 at 13:41:26 |
|
Title: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 13:41:26 I see a reoccurring phenomena. Every time the left sees a threat to their agenda, they do what they can to quell, suppress, repudiate the threat. They proudly tout their openness and tolerance as long as it doesn’t contradict their ideology. But what is that ideology? Two recent examples are of course the black lives matters and trump protests. Do you remember the professor from MU? A journalism professor none the less. Here are two fine examples of modern day Bolsheviks. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPG43X7SDB8[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HK1hFUD_d4[/media] Evidently, they do not like freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and I’m pretty sure they don’t care for the second amendment. Do they approve of the Constitution, I am starting to believe they do not. Please feel free to enter this discussion. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 14:04:51 In general I thought they are supposed to be... well... liberal, as in avoid prejudice when interacting with fellow human beings. Not to mention the threats to Donald Trump's life as well as his family........ Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/21/16 at 14:20:12 I need links to hit. Read this slowly. Use the phonetics. Taw luh runt Axe sep ting Li buh rull They taw luh rate and axe sept everything they are told is good to accept. Accepting anything that could be considered conservative, like the constitution,isn't acceptable. They have a right to stop you from speaking, because you're speaking out of hate or fear or just ignorance, otherwise, you would understand and agree with them. Besides, they don't wanna hear it. |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 15:24:06 26393F3825221323132B39357E4C0 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HK1hFUD_d4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPG43X7SDB8 Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by Serowbot on 03/21/16 at 15:25:53 You want them to be tolerant of racism and hate speech?... Was tolerance of the Nazi's killing Jews a good thing?... Liberals don't work that way... |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 15:57:12 7660776A72676A71050 wrote:
Yes, they should be tolerant. No one on either side of the political spectrum has the right to decide what message everyone should receive. That is the epitome of propaganda and manufacturing consent. The Soviets used those same tactics and killed 10's of millions more compared to the Nazi's. For some reason no one mentions the Communists. How do you feel about the Soviets? Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by DesertRat on 03/21/16 at 16:18:39 In most debates, folks tend to ignore the soviets killing fields, but have no problems mentioning the jewish slaughters. It is COMPLETELY ignored in school too. |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by oldNslow on 03/21/16 at 16:26:18 5F495E435B4E43582C0 wrote:
Quite right. A lot of liberals apparently don't understand that there is a difference between mass murder and "speech" that they don't agree with or are "offended " by or that scares them. I think you need a better example ::) |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by Serowbot on 03/21/16 at 16:38:05 Promising racist policies as a candidate should be protested... What?.. you want them to wait 'til he's elected, then protest his actions?... Whether it's Soviets or Nazis,... the goal is to stop it from happening, not allow them to be in power and wait to see what happens... How stupid is that?... Oh,.. we'll let Hitler get elected, then,... we'll protest what he does... ::) |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 16:48:19 382E39243C29243F4B0 wrote:
No one said they could protest; however, when their actions deny someone of their constitution rights of freedom of speech & assembly it is a problem. Furthermore when people start blocking highways and posting threats on the internet, and directly threatening his family it become a serious problem. They are not doing the right things for the right reasons, they are acting like thugs. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by pg on 03/21/16 at 16:51:21 Bot, I pose two questions for you. 1. DO you believe in the Constitution? 2. How do you feel about the Soviets? Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by WebsterMark on 03/21/16 at 18:10:06 2731263B23363B20540 wrote:
You've totally lost it dude....Hitler?! Really? Are you that completely out of touch with reality or just suffering the effects outta get your a$$ kicked by that black dude in Tucson at the Trump rally?.... |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by raydawg on 03/21/16 at 18:13:26 1204130E16030E15610 wrote:
Yeah you buffoons...... What, wait till the Muslim Extremist rule.... Then call them, uh..... Muslim Extremist :-[ |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by DesertRat on 03/21/16 at 20:51:46 3721362B33262B30440 wrote:
;D ;D ;D reminds me of Piglosi's infamous speech: Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/22/16 at 03:07:59 He rents a venue. People come to hear. Nobody has a right to deny him his First Amendment. You don't like what Trump says, protest, don't block. You ALLOW him to speak and those who want to attend, to Attend. That's America. You can believe that what he says is hateful and bigoted. I don't. Even if I agreed with the Verdict I'd still know that he has a right to express his views. Do the left even SEE what they are? Hateful little tyrants,, |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by raydawg on 03/22/16 at 03:45:03 This is why Hillary is running as a democrat...... She knows party TRUMPS actions, and she can do what she wants to fuel her personal coffers, be the first woman president, etc, because the left is about an idea, not the person. Ideology based on the idea they are better, more compassionate, open-minded, etc.... Of course the Crusaders thought so, I dare say even ISIS thinks as much about their motivation. Yet, their actions do NOT testify as such. If Hillary was running as a liberal republican, which she is just as much as a liberal democrat, she would be hammered on her scandals, and Bill would be labeled a sexual predator..... |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/22/16 at 05:50:22 IOW, change Nothing about her but the D, make it an R, and the left would hate her. Absolutely. Obama and his Victory lap after jamming a cruise missile through a wedding party, killing many, and he was elated, they got ONE bad guy. The left were unmoved. Had Bush done it, ohhh, my.. |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by Serowbot on 03/22/16 at 07:06:04 74677F62677161060 wrote:
Must be the Religious Left... ;D |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by raydawg on 03/22/16 at 08:02:30 293F28352D38352E5A0 wrote:
Must be the Religious Left... ;D[/quote] No, a zealot is just that..... You can attach any cause to justify, as others have pointed out about the left getting angry and acting out, but you don't want to admit that do you punkin, cuz you is justified.... |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by Serowbot on 03/22/16 at 08:21:09 67746C71746272150 wrote:
Whatever you say,... sweet cheeks... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Reoccurring Phenomena Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/22/16 at 12:46:57 As much as the people who support Trump/Cruz Know how wrong headed Hillary is, we don't see bubs blocking access to or disrupting her speeches and suggesting violence. It's hard to say who is paying the rent a mob clowns. It's not impossible for it to be deeply entrenched in the establishment bubs. I expect dems to jump the aisle and vote for trump, but I don't think he or Cruz will be the nominee. The establishment hates both and, should one be the nominee, the entrenched and powerful bubs will vote for, twist arms for, make deals for, supporting her. They would rather lose the election than have the apple cart turned over. The gravy train and and the pork could be shut down. One easily found example. The Army would rather spend it elsewhere. al budget world these days, in which automatic spending cuts are leaving sought-after pet programs struggling or unpaid altogether. Republicans and Democrats for years have fought so bitterly that lawmaking in Washington ground to a near-halt. Yet in the case of the Abrams tank, there's a bipartisan push to spend an extra $436 million on a weapon the experts explicitly say is not needed. "If we had our choice, we would use that money in a different way," Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army's chief of staff, told The Associated Press this past week. Why are the tank dollars still flowing? Politics. Keeping the Abrams production line rolling protects businesses and good paying jobs in congressional districts where the tank's many suppliers are located. If there's a home of the Abrams, it's politically important Ohio. The nation's only tank plant is in Lima. So it's no coincidence that the champions for more tanks are Rep. Jim Jordan and Sen. Rob Portman, two of Capitol's Hill most prominent deficit hawks, as well as Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. They said their support is rooted in protecting national security, not in pork-barrel politics. And that Joint fighter jet? Yeah, check that abysmal failure out. What is the Total US Government Revenue? In FY 2016, total US government revenue, federal, state, and local, is “guesstimated” to be $6.6 trillion. Federal revenue is budgeted at $3.3 trillion; state revenue is “guesstimated” at $1.9 trillion; local revenue is “guesstimated” at $1.4 trillion. a usgovernmentrevenue.com briefing: And for WHAT? Well, every Dollar created comes with an interest payment. http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html This guy was in the right job to know what he was talking about. I think it's time for the masses to accept the FACT that the Fed is sucking the marrow out of our labors. Stop believing what they tell you and LOOK where we are. And, just for the sake of argument, let's just Say that the fed Was established with nothing but the best intentions. Again, LOOK at the Mission Statement The Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States. It was founded by Congress in 1913 to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. Over the years, its role in banking and the economy has expanded. Today, the Federal Reserve's duties fall into four general areas: conducting the nation's monetary policy by influencing the monetary and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation's banking and financial system and to protect the credit rights of consumers maintaining the stability of the financial system and containing systemic risk that may arise in financial markets providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions, including playing a major role in operating the nation's payments system How's THAT working out? Explain why such failure should be continued. If this was a college course only three or four of you would be passing. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |