SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Drink Up,Sweetie
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1412041513

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 09/29/14 at 18:45:12

Title: Drink Up,Sweetie
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/29/14 at 18:45:12

http://www.rense.com/general96/howtheymarketed.html

How They Marketed A Poison For Human Consumption

From Dr. Betty Martini D.Hum.
9-28-14
Just an excerpt... but this is just One More piece of the puzzle.

Aspartame Disease…An Ignored Epidemic
SunsetPress.com

The aspartame wars have roared on over three decades. The history of fraud, deceit and power are a matter of record. On any day you can go to google and read new studies or articles on the havoc this deadly poison is causing. Try as they might the manufacturers could never get a deadly chemical poison to show safety. The molecule breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent, and when the rats began to have brain tumors G. D. Searle would excise them, put them back in the study, and when they died would resurrect them on paper,.On Jan 10, l977 in a 33 page letter,

FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill recommended to U.S. Attorney Sam Skinner that a grand jury investigate Searle for "apparent violations of the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 331 (e), and the False Reports to the Government Act, 18 U.S.C. 1001, for 'their willful and knowing failure to make reports to the Food and Drug Administration required by the Act, 21 U.S.C. 355 (i), and for concealing material facts and making false statements in reports of animal studies conducted to establish the safety of aspartame.' The FDA called special attention to studies investigating the effect of NutraSweet on monkeys and hamsters.

Unfortunately, the statutes ran out and both US Prosecutors, Skinner and Conlon, were hired by the defense team. Dr. John Olney who founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity tried t

Title: Re: Drink Up,Sweetie
Post by Kris01 on 09/30/14 at 20:32:13

I tend to stay away from artificial sweeteners of any kind...for pretty much no reason at all. Plain old sugar just makes more sense to me.

Anyway, I wonder how much they feed the rats to give them tumors. I mean if it's the same amount as you would find in a Mountain Dew then that's bad. But if the amount of one dose is equal to the aspartame found in 15 gallons of Mountain Dew then there study is skewed.

Just wonderin'

Title: Re: Drink Up,Sweetie
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 09/30/14 at 21:05:08

Yea,if it's Scientific,then it would be proportional.. I think observed reality supports the position that these Sweeteners are Bad. Even if there was no Study,I SEE what is going on..

Title: Re: Drink Up,Sweetie
Post by mpescatori on 10/01/14 at 01:27:03

IIRC the doses are hugely disproportionate to body mass, not because the scientists are sadistic b*st*rds, but because they must produce results in a few months, or a few years at the most.

There's only one way you can simulate the effects of drinking aspartame for 20-25 years, and that's "drugging" lab animals to abnormally disproportionate doses
(often they aren't even fed the drug via food, it's delivered IV)
Otherwise you cannot have results in time.

Still, my wife says aspartame has a bitter aftertaste and she can tell it a mile away...
Be careful because often drinks are labeled "normal" (i.e. they are not labeled "Diet" or "sugarfree") but they still have aspartame because it's actually cheaper than sugar.

:P

Title: Re: Drink Up,Sweetie
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 10/01/14 at 15:27:22

https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100816084319AAqJPR4

Of course it's "Natural"and cheap. Look at how it's made. Then look at what it turns into as the body digests it.