|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Some Thoughts on Fox /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1353828678 Message started by Starlifter on 11/24/12 at 23:31:18 |
|
Title: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/24/12 at 23:31:18 <snip> The reality is that someone needs to start speaking the truth about Fox News, for we must grow out of the mindset which leads us to believe that any pack of bigots with access to a media megaphone has a right to have their opinions respected. In fact, part of me believes that Fox News should be considered treasonous for its efforts to rip the nation at the seams in order to make a profit. There’s almost nothing productive about speaking to Fox News analysts or feeding into the mindset that has continued to poison America. They are like the WWE of journalism, believing that a few million dollars and a large audience can fool others into believing that you have real journalistic integrity. Nearly every branded clown on the network, from Geraldo “Trayvon died for wearing a hoodie” Rivera to Juan “The Happy Negro” Williams has built a career on a foundation of lies, manipulation and blatant bigotry. The words from this fictional conversation remind me of why I went from appearing on Fox every other day back in 2007 (before I truly understood what they are trying to do), to turning down every appearance request they’ve made for the last five years. The network has served as a platform of ideological terrorists and those who are determined to destroy the country we love. Any individual interacting with Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly or others in the Fox News “Axis of Ignorance” walks away feeling as disgusted as a nun who slept with her neighbor for a pound of butter. Fox News is probably the most unAmerican news network in the history of the United States. It is a reminder of just how much work we must do to make our nation into what we want and need it to be. Hannity’s prominence and high salary are visible manifestations of the racism and ignorance that lies in the hearts of millions of Americans. We can track our nation’s progress toward racial healing by the ratings of this horrible network. We will know that America is a better country when Fox News ceases to exist. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/12 at 05:42:17 snip: okay, Star i see every now and then you don't try to steal someone else's quote. What genius said all this? |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/25/12 at 07:08:12 Fox News can lie! Comment: Got the following email today. Was wondering how accurate the information is. Subject: FOX can Legally Lie FOX News has legally argued in court that they have the right to LIE and OBFUSCATE and won! NEW WORLD COMMUNICATIONS OF TAMPA, INC., versus JANE AKRE Case No. 2D01-529. http://www.projectcensored.org/publi...s/2005/11.html This is interesting and SCAREY! Excerpt below: "In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States. "Fox" argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves. Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre's claim that they pressured her to broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right to do so." Please go to link above and read whole story if you're concerned |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Arizuno on 11/25/12 at 08:19:20 This serves to (partially) explain why people who get their "news" from Fox are more ignorant about current events than people who don't follow the news at all. Were Fox compelled to be truthful, they'd be forced into silence. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by 360k+ on 11/25/12 at 11:29:11 IMHO, Faux does not provide news. Instead, it provides rightwing commentary disguised to look and sound like news. The studio, setting, commentators, and guests, are all cleverly engineered to look like the other news stations, but the mission is clearly not one of unbiased news. I think the main purpose of Faux is indoctrination to a way of thinking. It's not much different than some 3rd world countries that have government controlled media (North Korea, for instance). What you hear is a message that has been massaged by psychologists to produce a desired effect on the listener's mind, and just like other indoctrination techniques, over a period of time it will produce an altered way of thinking, and decision making. However, is this not true in the case of any media? |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/25/12 at 11:59:01 596A71626D7677180 wrote:
I used to visit the neighbors. Fox was almost always on. They changed channel when G.Beck came on somewhere else, then, Straight back to Fox.,. Yes, theyre terrifyingly ignorant of what reality is, Were Fox compelled to be truthful, they'd be forced into silence.[/quote] No, not at all,, a lot of what they SAY, in the Reporting of Fact IS factually correct. They get dangerous in their Commentary, where they tell people Why that happened, or How it will play out & why they should be Terrified. We have spec ops teams antagonizing Iran & any time Iran farts or the Palestinians/Hamas lobs a missile at Israel, theyre a Proxy arm of Iran,, OUr media is working overtime to con the sheeple into supporting another "Preemptive strike" to "Protect ahr fraydoms" some more,, & these rubes eat it up.. Must Fight Must Protect Peace.. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/12 at 11:59:40 Are you guys really so foolish as to believe Fox acts any differently than any other news organization? In the middle of a week when the economic news was awful and we were still trying to figure out why Obama lied about what happened when out ambassador was killed, a Pew research study showed MSNBC ran zero 'news' stories than were negative about the president. zero. Okay, fine he's their guy, we get that. But zero? Nothing? and you clowns are fixated on Fox News?.... Fox News is what it is because of NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN. You liberals who loved the monopoly you had on news for decades have only yourself to blame. Fox was the only outfit to push the reporting about what happened to the ambassador. The others just decided to follow that story would hurt their guy so they decided a dead ambassador was a fair trade for an obama victory. I agree 100% Fox leans right which is a balance to the left leaning nature of every other network. The nation needs Fox News. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/25/12 at 18:33:31 The Nation needs some UNbiased new reporting, None offer that on TV. Its left or right, none is w/o bias, an agenda driven "news" provider.. The globalists took control of the media decades before any of us were born. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/25/12 at 18:53:36 There has never been unbaised news. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/25/12 at 19:42:39 Study shows Fox News Viewers Know Less Than People Who Don't Watch Any News. (They needed a "study" to come to this conclusion?) ;D ;D ;D <snip> Fox News viewers are less informed than people who don't watch any news, according to a new poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University. The poll surveyed New Jersey residents about the uprisings in Egypt and the Middle East, and where they get their news sources. The study, which controlled for demographic factors like education and partisanship, found that "people who watch Fox News are 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians overthrew their government" and "6-points less likely to know that Syrians have not yet overthrown their government" compared to those who watch no news. Overall, 53% of all respondents knew that Egyptians successfully overthrew Hosni Mubarak and 48% knew that Syrians have yet to overthrow their government. Dan Cassino, a political science professor at Fairleigh Dickinson, explained in a statement, "Because of the controls for partisanship, we know these results are not just driven by Republicans or other groups being more likely to watch Fox News. Rather, the results show us that there is something about watching Fox News that leads people to do worse on these questions than those who don’t watch any news at all." This isn't the first study that has found that Fox News viewers more misinformed in comparison to others. Last year, a study from the University of Maryland found that Fox News viewers were more likely to believe false information about politics." ******************************************************** The viewers of Fox "News" are intentionally being misinformed. It is challenge enough to be well informed without being intentionally misled. The nation has been harmed in a tangible way through this right wing propaganda. Just how bad is it? These Fox dummies are SURE that Obama is going to try to take their guns away. You know, just like Bill and Hillary did. Munitions manufacturers made ginormous profits through a misinformation campaign. I understand there was a second huge surge in ammunition and gun sales after Obama was reelected because he was sure to try to take their guns away in a second term. It's a great gig! Now they have created a wild conspiracy theory that Obama is going to change the law so he can be elected to a third term. They do not suspect for one moment that they could be the victims of a ruse. Teh stupid, it hurts. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/25/12 at 20:00:21 To me this whole election cycle and the ensuing post election smear campaign is outrageous. Fox News should have its plug pulled and be removed from the air waves for inciting fear and panic through the spread of lies and rumors as truth. It is damaging our country. This media outlet has gone far beyond just reporting the facts. Facts are not important to them and it is hurting our country. When a good chunk of the American people believe Obama was not born in the US, that he is a Muslim, he is coming for your guns, illegal's have more rights than whites, there were weapons of mass destructions in Iraq, there is no climate change, that reagan was a saint, that unions are bad, liberal are stupid, fetus are more important than babies, the pill is bad viagra is great, republicans can cheat but democrats must be impeached, ayn rand is a great writer, the insanity never ends. I am a strong proponent of free speech. But at the same time our sister democracy and my next door neighbor Canada, has successfully enacted laws which prevent a news station that lies to the public from getting a license. Broadcasting Fox from any Canadian station is prohibitated. I don't see why we couldn't do the same. Preventing lying is no affront to free speech. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/26/12 at 05:06:02 Broadcasting Fox from any Canadian station is prohibitated http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2004/11/18/fox_crtc041118.html should we ban you from here from lying which is something you do often? besides, Canada and free speech ain't what it used to be.... and you never answered this question Star: snip: okay, Star i see every now and then you don't try to steal someone else's quote. What genius said all this? |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/26/12 at 06:34:03 754740515647506F435049220 wrote:
Right again Web, but being biased un intentionally means you end up being called liberal by the conservatives and conservative by the liberals and you end up sort of straddling the neutral line that it averages out to be unbiased. Faux news ... well enuff said. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Pine on 11/26/12 at 14:13:42 hahah I love this thread.. so I can tell MY story: I like computer games... yup I play on the computer. So several years ago Fox did a story on a new game that came out. They brought out two "experts" to comment on the game. The experts agreed, the game was full of sex and violence and should be baned. One of the experts spoke directly to a violent scene in the game. Except the scene didnt exist. ... and the 'expert" had never seen the game ...oh wait NEITHER expert had spent any time in the game. One "expert' confessed (in a gaming trade blog)... he made it up, its what the network wanted So the game maker called Fox out... and Fox's response.. "come on our show and defend your position".. but our story stands.. well except we pulled every mention of it ever being reported and any video we had of it off the web. When the story first broke.. me and about 400 forum members went and looked at the offending story..(it DID exist) a day later it was gone.. you cant even find that it EVER occurred now. I NEVER watch Fox... has nothing to do with politics. Fox is an entertaiment station.. and if I want entertainment I watch syfy or History, or TLC, or Discovery. So you two ( dems and reps) hash out Fox all you want... best I can do .. pretend they do not exist. I win!!!! ;D PS; I dont watch CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, or any other for that matter. I love what Ronnie said " Trust but verify" ... so pretty much google. edit: clean up PS: I found a separate post about it: http://www.helium.com/items/818087-how-the-media-is-going-out-of-control |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/26/12 at 15:44:02 Ooooo ... I'll tell you where Faux news really works though On election night, I was watching CNN, and as Obama was pulling ahead and they were saying OH and FL etc were going against RMoney ... I knew that the Faux news wil lskew it RMoney's way, and if they throw in the towel calling it for Obama, it was over ... and man was it worth it. Karl Rove's rant was singularly worth it. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/26/12 at 19:09:42 Karl Rove's total meltdown live on camera was priceless.Why was he so 100% absolutly SURE that Rmoney would win?...see below. (snicker) Cyber Sleuths Checkmated Rove? http://occupyforaccountability.org/index.php?q=node%2F1075 ...On November 12th, we received a letter from “The Protectors,” apparently a group of white hat cyber sleuths, mentioning our reward and stating that two months ago, they began monitoring the “digital traffic of one Karl Rove, a disrespecter of the Rule of Law, knowing that he claimed to be Kingmaker while grifting vast wealth from barons who gladly handed him gold to anoint another King while looking the other way.” http://www.velvetrevolution.us/images/Anon_Rove_Letter.pdf “The Protectors” said that they had identified the digital structure of Rove’s operation and of ORCA, a Republican get out the vote software application. After finding open “doors” in the systems, they created a “password protected firewall” called “The Great Oz,” and installed it on servers that Rove planned to use on election night to re-route and change election results “from three states.” The letter indicated that “ORCA Killer” was launched at 10am EST and “The Great Oz” at 8pm EST on November 6th. “The Protectors” watched as ORCA crashed and failed throughout Election Day. They watched as Rove’s computer techs tried 105 times to penetrate “The Great Oz” using different means and passwords.... ...On election night, Mr. Rove worked the three states that held the key to the election – Ohio, Florida and Virginia. But when he tried to access the Ohio election website, he kept getting error messages. Oh, and if there is still any doubt that Rmoney is a criminal, see below. <snip> "...To date, Romney’s legal troubles include fallacious FEC and SEC disclosures, an investigation into him and his son’s connection to an $8.5 billion Ponzi scheme, and concealing over $15 million from the auto-bailout, and now his surrogate’s malfeasance and perjury in the eToys bankruptcy case.... ...on November 7, the day after his crushing defeat, the Delaware bankruptcy court judge entered the motion into the public docket and scheduled a hearing for December 4, 2012; all on the same day. It was a victory for the whistleblower and eToys investors, and incriminating for the Delaware court and Willard Romney because although the judge received the Emergency Motion on October 24th, it was withheld from the public docket until after it was clear Romney lost the election and would not be appointing an attorney general to drop the case." |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/27/12 at 05:28:48 hey, liar boy Starlifter, you should address the two issues below before you continue to post stuff. 1) snip: okay, Star i see every now and then you don't try to steal someone else's quote. What genius said all this? Who said your original quote? Give me a source. 2) Broadcasting Fox from any Canadian station is prohibitated you said Fox is legally prevented from broadcasting from any Canadian station. Show me your source and verify this. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/27/12 at 20:47:35 Webster, you vex me like a fly...Maybe you could stick your head back up your ass and run along down the road. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/27/12 at 21:31:58 Much as I find him vexing, Id like to see those answers myself,. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Midnightrider on 11/27/12 at 21:55:02 As much as I despise Fox, they have a legal right to do what they do and I have a right not to listen to their horsesh!t. Rush Lyeball Limpaddict probably does more harm than Fox. He's full of hate, not to mention other things. He's a racist Nazi who stirs up hate. The world would be a better place without him. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/27/12 at 22:17:17 JOG, be advised: Webster is a fool who doesn't know his ass from live steam. He is "persona non grate" to me and I refuse to further acknowlege any more of his name-calling, lies, snark, and bullsh!t. ...So, okay JOG, just for you: FOX News IS available in Canada, but being a "fantasy" channel, it's only available on "Pay TV." as they have laws against lying on real news channels. Canada’s Radio Act requires that “a licenser may not broadcast … any false or misleading news.” The provision has kept Fox News and right-wing talk radio out of Canada and helped make Canada a model for liberal democracy and freedom. As a result of that law, Canadians enjoy high quality news coverage, including the kind of foreign affairs and investigative journalism that flourished in this country before Ronald Reagan abolished the “Fairness Doctrine” in 1987. Regulators Reject Proposal That Would Bring Fox-Style News to Canada. Source "Toronto Star" Fox News will not be moving into Canada after all! The reason: Canada regulators announced last week they would reject efforts by Canada's right wing Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, to repeal a law that forbids lying on broadcast news. Canada's Radio Act requires that "a licenser may not broadcast....any false or misleading news." The provision has kept Fox News and right wing talk radio out of Canada and helped make Canada a model for liberal democracy and freedom. As a result of that law, Canadians enjoy high quality news coverage including the kind of foreign affairs and investigative journalism that flourished in this country before Ronald Reagan abolished the "Fairness Doctrine" in 1987. Political dialogue in Canada is marked by civility, modesty, honesty, collegiality, and idealism that have pretty much disappeared on the U.S. airwaves. When Stephen Harper moved to abolish anti-lying provision of the Radio Act, Canadians rose up to oppose him fearing that their tradition of honest non partisan news would be replaced by the toxic, overtly partisan, biased and dishonest news coverage familiar to American citizens who listen to Fox News and talk radio. Harper's proposal was timed to facilitate the launch of a new right wing network, "Sun TV News" which Canadians call "Fox News North." Harper, often referred to as "George W. Bush's Mini Me," is known for having mounted a Bush like war on government scientists, data collectors, transparency, and enlightenment in general. He is a wizard of all the familiar tools of demagoguery; false patriotism, bigotry, fear, selfishness and belligerent religiosity. Harper's attempts to make lying legal on Canadian television is a stark admission that right wing political ideology can only dominate national debate through dishonest propaganda. Since corporate profit-taking is not an attractive vessel for populism, a political party or broadcast network that makes itself the tool of corporate and financial elites must lie to make its agenda popular with the public. In the Unites States, Fox News and talk radio, the sock puppets of billionaires and corporate robber barons have become the masters of propaganda and distortion on the public airwaves. Fox News's notoriously biased and dishonest coverage of the Wisconsin's protests is a prime example of the brand of news coverage Canada has smartly avoided. ***************************************************************** The other reference, (Study shows Fox News Viewers Know Less Than People Who Don't Watch Any News). Came from a study done at Fairleigh Dickinson University. Fox News viewers are less informed than people who don't watch any news, according to a new poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University. **************************************************************** Now that's it, any further questions, do your own research. Google is your friend. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/27/12 at 22:59:14 FOX News IS available in Canada, but being a "fantasy" channel, it's only available on "Pay TV." as they have laws against lying on real news channels I think thats Fabulous! |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/28/12 at 06:27:53 I can tell you one thing about canadian TV though ... I lived there in 98/99, didn't notice the absence of anything cos I wasn't that into TV, but their political farce genre is absolutely killer. Ours ... well is non existent. I actually like canadian TV overall, quality not quantity is the motto. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/28/12 at 09:38:47 Star; are you honestly so stupid that you really believe a Canadian governmental body made a determination that Fox News was factually incorrect so therefore could not broadcast in Canada? Are you that stupid or are you the most gullible idiot on the planet? Which one? below is from Fox's website showing their canadian broadcasters and another paragraph from Wikipiedia. Canada Aliant Artic Co-operatives Limited Askivision Systems Inc. http://www.aski.ca/ Bell Express Vu http://www.bell.ca/home/ Black Creek TV Bobcaygeon Cable Breauce Distribution Brooke Brooks Bay Cable Corporation http://www.brooksbaycable.com/pages.php?section=index Bruce Telecom Buffalo Narrows Broadcasting Cable Axion Digitel http://www.axion.ca/fr/ Cable Cable Cable TV Slave Lake Cable VDN http://www.vdn.ca/ Cablovision ACL City West Cable and Telephone Compton Cable TV Conuma Cablesystems Coop Antelle TV St-Zacharie Cooperative de Cablodistribution Bellarmin Country Broadcasting Corp Cross Country East Link http://www.eastlink.ca/cable/cable/index.asp Fenelon Falls Haisla Hay Huron Gitxaala Cable KBS TV Keta Cable Lake Broadcasting Lake Huron Resort Cable Mascon Milk River Cable Club Mitchell Seaforth Mornington MTS http://www.mts.ca/ New North Networks http://www.newnorth.ca/ Nexicom Communcations, Inc. http://www.nexicom.net/ Next Dimension www.nextdimensioninc.com/ Nor-Del Cablevision http://www.nor-del.com/ North Nova Northwestel Cable Inc. Omega Cable Quadro Raftview Communications Rose Island Ventures, Inc. SaskTel http://www.sasktel.com/ Sayward Valley Communications Seaview Commuications Shaw http://www.shaw.ca/en-ca Shaw Direct http://www.shawdirect.ca/english/default.asp Sun Country Source Cable http://www.sourcecable.ca/residential.html St Jacques de Leeds Telus http://telus.com/regionselect.html TBayTel http://www.tbaytel.net/residential/ Tuckersmith http://www.tcc.on.ca/index.php Ucluelet Video Ward Westman Comm http://www.westmancom.com/ Wightman Telecom http://www.wightman.ca/ Yourlink http://www.yourlink.ca/ Rogers http://www.rogers.com/web/Rogers.portal _______________________________________________________________________ Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184837,00.html#ixzz2DXW2Y1vw Canada In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada because Fox News U.S. and Global Television were planning to create Fox News Canada (a combination of U.S. and Canadian news). In 2004, after a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[85] Fox News Channel is currently offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers, SaskTel, Shaw Cable, Shaw Direct and Telus TV. An exception is Vidéotron, Canada's third-largest cable company, which has not added Fox News Channel to its lineup. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/28/12 at 12:52:30 From current.com - http://current.com/community/93886320_fox-news-banned-in-canada-its-illegal-to-broadcast-lies-and-label-it-news-according-to-canadian-law.htm Oh yea they Librull ... OK then how about readersupported news http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/5123-fox-news-lies-keep-them-out-of-canada Librull again - OK then how about liveleak.com (Dont they make diapers ?) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=363_1343706547 OK librull again ... Lets try globalpost - http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/canada/111205/canadas-fox-news-north-takes-the-cbc Librull again ? Well atleast globalpost has a different reason instead of just saying "fox lies" Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/28/12 at 14:01:29 Well atleast globalpost has a different reason instead of just saying "fox lies" Star lies, that much is a fact. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/28/12 at 17:00:08 ...yawn Perhaps you missed my last piece of advice to you...which was... Stick your head back up your ass and run along down the road fool. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/28/12 at 17:49:12 Why would I do that? Star; you can watch Fox News in Canada. They are not banned. You lied, got caught and now run away by changing the topic. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Serowbot on 11/28/12 at 18:14:40 0E3C3B2A2D3C2B14382B32590 wrote:
Web,... ...grow up... |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/28/12 at 20:24:53 I'm not going to argue this point. FOX news is banned in Canada period! I live here, I know! |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/28/12 at 21:57:15 fox news canada Fox News' Lies Keep Them Out of Canada - Reader Supported News 'Fox News will not be moving into Canada after all! The reason: Canadian regulators today announced they would reject efforts by Canada's right-wing Prime Minister ... readersupportednews.org/.../276-74/5123-fox-news...of-canada - Cached Regulators Reject Proposal That Would Bring Fox-Style News to ... [Mar 1, 2011] Canada's Radio Act requires that "a licenser may not broadcast....any false or misleading news." The provision has kept Fox News and right wing ... ( 3090 Comments ) www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/fox-news-will... - Cached More results from huffingtonpost.com » Web,, save yourself further embarrassment,, look stuff up before you start arguing & calling people names,, Id say ya owe LIfter at least a 6 pack,, if you wuz any prettier, Id suggest somethin else,, but I dont want him feelin "dirty" like that,, |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/29/12 at 05:06:32 I did look it up. i posted a link from Fox website showing links to carriers. The idea that Fox cannot broadcast in Canada because it's been determined it lies is silly! By that definition, no news would be broadcast. Come on people, honestly! |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/29/12 at 05:32:44 I pulled up one of the links from the Wiki page and looked for Fox News. Fox News is on Channel 289 on the Eastlink Cable network which serves British Columbia area. ......and by the way, I guess I shouldn't be surprised if Fox News was censored in Canada. Their free speech rights are slipping away..... liberals strike again.... |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/29/12 at 17:11:11 ;D ;D ;D Good one JOG... FOX Webster? Webby my friend, give it up man. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/29/12 at 19:23:52 I pulled up one of the links from the Wiki page and looked for Fox News. Fox News is on Channel 289 on the Eastlink Cable network which serves British Columbia area. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/29/12 at 19:59:37 Fantasy TV, pay for view...everyone here but you know that FOX is not news, it's just lies from the propaganda mouthpiece of the radical right...Just what point are you trying to make here by insisting that Canadians watch FOX news??.. They don't watch it, as all thinking people everywhere don't watch it...so what's your point? Do you want to think that everyone everywhere is a dumb as you are??...I don't get it?? |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 05:58:25 Fantasy TV, pay for view...everyone here but you know that FOX is not news, it's just lies from the propaganda mouthpiece of the radical right...Just what point are you trying to make here by insisting that Canadians watch FOX news??.. They don't watch it, as all thinking people everywhere don't watch it...so what's your point? Do you want to think that everyone everywhere is a dumb as you are??...I don't get it?? Fantasy TV, pay for view?? Isn't that called cable?.... See, this is what happens with you. Star made a ridiculous allegation that Fox News was absolutely banned from Canada because of lying. He posted links from goofy sources. I took 60 seconds and found out those were hoaxes and found a link showing Fox News in Canada. Faced with the truth, the liar now changes the game by saying by insisting that Canadians watch FOX news??.. They don't watch it, which is a different matter entirely and has nothing to do with anything. I have no idea or care what the ratings are for Fox News in Canada. That’s not the point. Star, you lied again and got caught, yet again. The irony of course is you got caught lying about lying. Precious… I suspect you’ll either stop posting on this topic, make another ridiculous statement that has nothing to do with the issue, or let Sew or someone else cover your tail for you. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 07:18:55 Web you should know this, Or has Rush "the pill popping" Lame bag not told you ... Fox is broadcast, it always was in the US ... its a dog-ear and you have it types. Putting in on a paid service even if it is cable, is not the same as broadcast. Cable is not regulated the way broadcast is, it can be sandwiched by Playboy and hustler and its fine ... that isn't broadcast ... Ooo man that would be a cool sammich though ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 07:42:19 Web you should know this, Or has Rush "the pill popping" Lame bag not told you ... Fox is broadcast, it always was in the US ... its a dog-ear and you have it types. What is it with you and rush limbaugh? Do you have a man crush or somehting on him? Can you type more than 5 words in a row without bringing him up? I can't get CNN unless it's on cable. again, you are missing the point and doing it on purpose I suppose. Star said Fox News was banned in Canada for lying. It is not. End of story. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 08:06:51 No one is talking about CNN. Faux news was trying to be on broadcast in canadia. There they were shot down. Anyone can put something up on cable. Rush "and I know where the rush comes from" Lamebag is relevant here cos you seem to be getting your ideas from him. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 08:39:58 No one is talking about CNN. Faux news was trying to be on broadcast in canadia. There they were shot down. geez... you are a hard head. they were not shot down. You've fallen victim to left wing hoax. Now drop it and move on. Star lied and you bought it. Buyer beware next time. CRTC approves Fox News for Canada Last Updated: Thursday, November 18, 2004 | 9:52 PM ET CBC News The conservative-leaning Fox News Channel will soon be coming to Canadian digital television channels. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) approved an application Thursday to bring the Fox News Channel, one of the highest-rated news channels in the United States, onto Canadian digital airwaves. The Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) applied to the broadcast regulator in April. Canadians already have access to the main Fox network, but not the right-leaning, 24-hour news channel, with its trademarked slogan of "fair and balanced." The Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) opposed the application, saying it would discourage foreign broadcasters from partnering with Canadian broadcasters. However, in its decision, the CRTC said Fox News offers little Canadian coverage and is not "partially or totally competitive with any Canadian pay or specialty service." It added that the channel would "significantly boost digital penetration in Canada" and increase the availability of digital services in the country. The CRTC also approved the NFL Network, a 24-hour "lifestyle and entertainment" channel for football fans. It doesn't carry live games, with the exception of a few exhibition games. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 08:57:35 Wowee ... 2004 eh mark. Why dont you go back even further ... say 1968 ... when the catch phrase was "The I in Nixon stands for Integrity". They approved in 04, as per your article ... however the newer articles I have posted say otherwise. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 09:00:56 Fox News banned in Canada! It's Illegal to broadcast lies and label it News according to Canadian Law! source: http://baltic-review.com/2012/07/fox-news-banned-in-canada/ OK august 2012. You want to post something newer than that web, please be my guest. Once again, Looks like the light you're seeing @ the end of the tunnel, is cos you're head is crammed so far up Rush "my housekeeper sold me these pills I thought were vitamins" Lamebag's ass is the fact that he is chattering non stop and you're seeing it through his mouth. Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 09:10:03 you're referencing a newspaper from the Baltics as a source?.... wtf?... did you read the comments below the article?... Dude, drop it. Of course you can get Fox News in Canada. Stop looking so stupid. You got duped. Move on. Once again, Looks like the light you're seeing @ the end of the tunnel, is cos you're head is crammed so far up Rush "my housekeeper sold me these pills I thought were vitamins" Lamebag's ass is the fact that he is chattering non stop and you're seeing it through his mouth. see how stupid you look? |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 09:16:26 360403121504132C00130A610 wrote:
Oh wow ... that was just what I threw on from a quick google - My other post - From current.com - http://current.com/community/93886320_fox-news-banned-in-canada-its-illegal-t... Oh yea they Librull ... OK then how about readersupported news http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/5123-fox-news-lies-keep-them-o... Librull again - OK then how about liveleak.com (Dont they make diapers ?) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=363_1343706547 OK librull again ... Lets try globalpost - http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/canada/111205/canada... Librull again ? Well atleast globalpost has a different reason instead of just saying "fox lies" OK so all these are lying ? and why would they all lie ... and all in the same direction, and you can find only a 2004 article ? Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 09:36:05 Idiot! Last time. It was an article from 2004 when the license was granted Fox News. Saying it is not relevant because it's from 2004 is like saying if today I cited a news article published in 2004 about a company incorporating in that year is not relevant because the article was from 2004. Are you smart enough to understand that? Fox News is not banned from Canada because the Canadian government determined they lied. You can watch Fox News in Canada if you want. Star lied and you fell for it. I'm done with this post. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 10:17:07 192B2C3D3A2B3C032F3C254E0 wrote:
If you repeat the lies 20 or 30 times it becomes true ... that's what Mitt "the billionaire I go the way the wind blows" RMoney believed in ... and now he's president ... with Paul "I have a name like Ron Paul" Ryan as his Veep huh ... OK so they were given a licence in 2004. Then they had it taken away in 2011 ? There is 5 articles and actually more including the huffington post ... I found quite a few more sources from that mid 2011 time frame ... so it was taken away ? or they are all lying, and in synch with each other ... and only you are telling the truth ? Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 11:46:32 OK so they were given a licence in 2004. Then they had it taken away in 2011 ? No There is 5 articles and actually more including the huffington post ... I found quite a few more sources from that mid 2011 time frame ... so it was taken away ? No or they are all lying, and in synch with each other ... and only you are telling the truth ? yes |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 12:11:37 023037262130271834273E550 wrote:
Yup, gotcha, millions of people lying and only you and Rush "the pill popping, housemaid blaming, wheore calling" Lamebag are telling the truth. Like I said - If you repeat the lies 20 or 30 times it becomes true ... that's what Mitt "the billionaire I go the way the wind blows" RMoney believed in ... and now he's president ... with Paul "I have a name like Ron Paul" Ryan as his Veep huh ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Serowbot on 11/30/12 at 12:42:21 1B292E3F38293E012D3E274C0 wrote:
Web,.. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by WebsterMark on 11/30/12 at 13:52:42 oh come on Sew; this guy makes Star a pleasure to deal with.... which pains me to admit that. Don't know what else to say other than idiot. You can watch Fox News in Canada. They are not banned. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 11/30/12 at 14:01:04 447671606776615E726178130 wrote:
Yes if you pay for it ... same with playboy and hustler and anything else you would pay for ... Cool. Srinath. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by Starlifter on 11/30/12 at 19:50:32 Webster, this is almost 2013...they have medicine now that could help you.. |
|
Title: Re: Some Thoughts on Fox Post by srinath on 12/01/12 at 19:07:11 57706576686D62706176040 wrote:
Hell no, I dont think we have made such advances yet. Cool. Srinath. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |