SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> More On Last Night's Debate
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1350525213

Message started by Starlifter on 10/17/12 at 18:53:32

Title: More On Last Night's Debate
Post by Starlifter on 10/17/12 at 18:53:32

Did you listen to Romney's Equal Pay For Women Answer Last Night? Two Solid Minutes Of Bullsh!t.

Rmoney is a MORMON! If you want to know his views on women just study their religion (cult). Women are subservient. Anyone who thinks a Mormon would think any different than Romney does has never looked at his religion. It defines him and always will. He would run the country just like a cult leader because that is what he is.

What struck me most about his response was when he started talking about flex time for the women in his administration so they could get home and cook dinner. I think that comment is getting overlooked a lot because of the binders comment. What year is this idiot living in?

Women are not as ambitious as men. (Really Mr. Rmoney)?

Because apparently, they didn't even _apply_ for jobs in his cabinet. He, a big strong chivalrous man, had to heroically SEARCH (which he didn't) for women (in binders) who wanted cabinet positions in his administration.

My asss! MAYBE if you are the governor of Planet Kolob (where Mormans go when they die...sheech) you would run into that situation...but not in Massachusetts.

What, these women in these binders were so shy and retiring and meek that you couldn't POSSIBLY have known about them if "feminist groups" hadn't been out there searching for them? No, you butthole; if it's even true that your staff just "didn't know" there were qualified women out there, it's because you and your staff are a bunch of old boys' network cronies who feined complete ignorance of these women in order to avoid having to bring any "girls" into their clubhouse.

Women care more about cooking dinner for their kids than about their careers. (Really)?

This is perhaps the part that pisses me (and Ms.two master's degrees Starlifter) off the most. Because it implies that all women are mothers (Ms. Starlifter is not) otherwise you wouldn't have to do this to get WOMEN into the workforce. And, that mothers do all the parenting (because obviously MEN don't need to be home at 5:00 to cook dinner for their kids). And, women with kids don't and can't pull their own weight at the office.

The advent of Feminism brought to women a sense of their own rightly claimed ability and power, and for all of the good it has done, I think there is a particular kind of American Man (me for one) that has felt REALLY, personally emasculated by that (and not all of us are psychic little boys).

he goes on to tell us that only when the economy is thriving will employers try to recruit women again. Because WE ALL KNOW that women only get into the workforce once all the men are used up. I mean why would you let a WOMAN who WANTS a job take one away from a MAN who NEEDS it?

*(Thanks to Ms. Starlifter for 90% of this post.) ;)

Title: Re: More On Last Night's Debate
Post by Serowbot on 10/17/12 at 22:59:06

Hello, Ms.Starlifter,... and thanks...
Women are far under represented in our Tall Table...
;)...

Yunno',.. I had a binder of women,... ...in high school,...
That wasn't a good idea, even then... :-?...

Title: Re: More On Last Night's Debate
Post by srinath on 10/18/12 at 20:25:29

I can not add anything to this post ... what else can you say to a "home run" ...
Cool.
Srinath.

Title: Re: More On Last Night's Debate
Post by Starlifter on 10/18/12 at 21:59:39

Thank you both for the complement to Ms. Star, she is very appreciative of your kind words. :D
...and she adds: ‘Binders Full of Women’ ...."That sounds like something a serial killer would have". :o