SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> The Cafe >> Your grammar is 100% correct. /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1341683565 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/12 at 10:52:45 |
Title: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/12 at 10:52:45 http://lewrockwell.com/rep3/grammar-quiz2.html Pretty easy,, kinda entertaining, short,, Try it, youll lIiike it. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Serowbot on 07/07/12 at 11:23:09 Bak too skool,... I dint speel Rasberries rite... :-?... 93%... |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/12 at 11:41:09 Well, DANG,, just hang yer head & look ashamed,, |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by bill67 on 07/07/12 at 12:34:40 57% |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by ALfromN.H. on 07/07/12 at 13:28:09 1 wrong = 93% |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/12 at 13:51:22 Which one did ya go wrong on Al? |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by ToesNose on 07/07/12 at 14:20:45 Raspberries!? Who put a random "P" in there!!! LOL one wrong ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Serowbot on 07/07/12 at 15:28:55 Darn, raspy, things... :-?... |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by arteacher on 07/07/12 at 16:02:34 100% (whew!) |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Trippah on 07/07/12 at 16:06:17 2 P, or not too pea, thar isa da kwestion. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by arteacher on 07/07/12 at 16:14:38 The English language is very weird. Phonetically you can spell "fish" ghoti. gh as in lauGH o as in wOmen ti as in acTIon |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Greg on 07/07/12 at 16:19:12 I believe they made a mistake on 2 questions... ::) |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Blinky on 07/07/12 at 16:20:15 As the product of the Texas educational system, I don't think I will even try. Since there is no recognized rule of grammer for the most commonly used word in the Texican language, the pronoun "yall", I am bound fail. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by runwyrlph on 07/07/12 at 16:29:20 "Yall" is incorrect. The proper word to use is "yinz" (or some experts prefer "yunz"). ;) |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by rfw2003 on 07/07/12 at 16:38:08 I've got perfect Texas grammar, but I apparently only have 64% english grammar. ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by High_Plains_Thumpr on 07/07/12 at 16:50:31 I cin hadly weight too posts ayegin! :D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Blinky on 07/07/12 at 17:20:37 Quote:
Here I must respectfully disagree. Your “expert” must have ancestry rooted in cooler lands to prefer the two syllable term “yunz” over the one syllable “yall” and create twice the work. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Mario Verasso on 07/07/12 at 17:56:16 Your grammar is 71% correct. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Pine on 07/07/12 at 19:51:56 Missed one.. 93%.. and it weren't berrys! Further.. Farther |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by splash07 on 07/07/12 at 20:39:22 forgot the apostrophe - y'all - as in "you all" |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by cowboy on 07/07/12 at 20:42:45 dang 64 :-X good thang folks hire me for my mech a neck skills |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by tizzyfit on 07/07/12 at 23:32:09 6259534578594553360 wrote:
Blame your dog, they will "P" on anything, 93% of the time. ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/12 at 23:44:07 Okay, without looking it up. Theres a steak seasoning by Lea & Perrins that starts with a W,, can you spell it? |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by rfw2003 on 07/07/12 at 23:51:34 3E2127203D3A0B3B0B33212D66540 wrote:
Not a chance |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/08/12 at 00:05:24 worcestershire I can spell it,, I cant say it worth a hoot.,. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by arteacher on 07/08/12 at 05:43:57 It's pronounced worshter, believe it or not. ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by High_Plains_Thumpr on 07/08/12 at 06:13:52 2A2D3B22224E0 wrote:
If referring to everyone, the correct grammer is, All Y'all. [smiley=cheesy.gif] |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Gyrobob on 07/08/12 at 07:01:00 100 BTW, worcestershire is pronounced WOOS te sher, or, in wikipedia: WUUS-t[ch601]r-sh[ch601]r |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/08/12 at 08:04:24 I avoid the hassle. I just ask for the Heinz 57. I can not only say that, I like it better. & If youre eatin Tater Tots & they got em cooked Just Right,, some Heinz 57 with mustard & ketchup & big jolt of pepper is some fine eatin.,. |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by 360k+ on 07/08/12 at 13:10:15 I missed the Raspberries one. Dang, that's upsetting! But there's no reason for me to be upset...??? Raspberries! I ain't got no raspberries. I don't need no raspberries! I don't got to show you no stinking raspberries. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsVi2RqE7ek All seriousness aside, I see a lot of misuse of... Its it's To, too Then, than There, their, they're but always remember... Time flies like arrows, Fruit flies like bananas |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by mpescatori on 07/10/12 at 02:39:13 1E202B363B363B590 wrote:
They're both wrong. As Worcester is an English city, and the main city in its "shire" (=region), the english pronounciation is... "Wooster" for the city (Woosta only in London), "Woosta-shar" for both the Shire and the sauce. Y'all have a problem with English cities, and I can't blame you. Canterbury (as in, the Archbishop of...) is "Cànter-b'ree", not "Canter-berry". As for the grammar, I got a measly 86%. Mixed up my further and farther, and my different "to" with "from"... :P ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Marksavage2006 on 07/10/12 at 11:05:26 71%. dummer than dirt. smarter than nuts |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by Gyrobob on 07/10/12 at 14:31:13 5E4356405052475C415A330 wrote:
They're both wrong. As Worcester is an English city, and the main city in its "shire" (=region), the english pronounciation is... "Wooster" for the city (Woosta only in London), "Woosta-shar" for both the Shire and the sauce. Y'all have a problem with English cities, and I can't blame you. Canterbury (as in, the Archbishop of...) is "Cànter-b'ree", not "Canter-berry". As for the grammar, I got a measly 86%. Mixed up my further and farther, and my different "to" with "from"... :P ;D[/quote] they are both correct in the US |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by zippythezip on 07/10/12 at 17:12:59 71% ;D |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by mpescatori on 07/11/12 at 00:07:57 Got that, Gyro. I already knew that names, just like drinks, change as they go acrtoss the ocean. The Imperial Gallon being 4.4 liters, the US gallon being 3.8 liters... It's a good thing the land mile didn't get any shorter as well ! ;D By the way, can anyone explain why there's a "Newark" just across the river from "New York"? Or was that due to pronounciation as well ? ::) |
Title: Re: Your grammar is 100% correct. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/12 at 00:28:11 http://www.howjsay.com/index.php?word=natchitoches in Louisiana http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nacogdoches In Texas |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |