SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Rubber Side Down! >> Odar's Savage
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1121842199

Message started by lancer on 07/19/05 at 23:49:59

Title: Odar's Savage
Post by lancer on 07/19/05 at 23:49:59

I just exchanged a few emails with Odar, from Sweden, and he shared with me some of what he has done with his Savage.  This is the Dyno test he did on his bike, which has a Raask open pipe and a rejetted stock carb.  He reports that the fuel/air ratio is nearly perfect throughout the entire range.  I think you will agree that he has done an excellent job of putting this all together.


http://photobucket.com/albums/v124/Odar1/Odars%20Savage/?http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v124/Odar1/Odars%20Savage/Dynobeforeafter.jpg

I wanted to show this to encourage some of the folks who are new to our family.  It really does not take very much effort to get a good return for your efforts.  Carb jetting does take a little clock time and patience but it can be done by most anyone and the results can be really great...besides that the cost is very low.

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by Greg_650 on 07/20/05 at 05:38:56

I wonder why his HP curves have different RPM ranges.

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by lancer on 07/20/05 at 05:52:55

What do you mean?  There is only one rpm range on the graph, at the bottom bar.

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by Odar on 07/20/05 at 15:02:07

Hi Michael
Great  ;D that you did put up my curves direct here on the forum, dont know what you meant Greag about different RPM ???.
But the stock curve are plotted in to the new runprintout, to have something to compare to, both curves are from my bike, I have had my bike on dynos several times, and always put the stock curves on the newest to compare to.
Take care Odar



Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by Greg_650 on 07/21/05 at 05:37:46

Ah.....well.....I have no idea what the heck I was thinking.  I look at it now, and it makes perfect sense.  Sorry.

Each pair of curves shows a respectable increase, but let's face it, the torque curve is the best....I see that peak torque seems to be developing about 500 RPMs later than stock...

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by GaThumper on 07/21/05 at 12:53:22

Yeah, but at the point where the stock torque peaks, he's still about 9 N-m more with the performance changes.  It's a win-win all the way around.


Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by Greg_650 on 07/22/05 at 06:12:49

Well, I was thinking that if the peak torque "rises" for a longer period of time, that the engine will be pulling harder for longer...

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by GaThumper on 07/22/05 at 06:37:35


Greg_650 wrote:
Well, I was thinking that if the peak torque "rises" for a longer period of time, that the engine will be pulling harder for longer...



Gotcha - I read your post differently initially.  Some people just have to have things spelled out for them :-)

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by Greg_650 on 07/22/05 at 06:44:00

;D

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by slavy on 07/22/05 at 08:20:50

What this graph shows is that if You intend to just putt-putt around with 3-4 500 RPM - You will be better off with the stock setting. You transfer this in mph. The only problem with this setting is that the stock setting / at least here in  SW USA/  might give You a seized engine. If You intend to ride above this range You can get a 33 % increase in the HP and about 23% increase in the torque pretty easy and cheap compared to the rest of the bikes. The decision is Yours.

Title: Re: Odar's Savage
Post by slavy on 07/22/05 at 08:27:20

Disregard the previous post- I red the chart wrong and I don't know how to remove the post.
The truth is - go ahead and just do it. It is well worthed the work !

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.